Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsDiscriminationOutsourcingWorkplace cultureWhistleblowing

Toxic culture at immigration centre saw staff abuse migrants

by Ashleigh Webber 19 Sep 2023
by Ashleigh Webber 19 Sep 2023 Brook House in West Sussex
PA Images / Alamy Stock Photo
Brook House in West Sussex
PA Images / Alamy Stock Photo

A toxic culture allowed staff to physically and verbally abuse migrants at an immigration removal centre in West Sussex, according to a public inquiry that heard evidence of significant mistreatment.

Staff at Brook House immigration detention centre near Gatwick Airport were found to have subjected detainees to degrading treatment, including forcibly moving people while they were naked, and speaking to migrants using racist, homophobic and derogatory language.

Staff often showed little regard for migrants’ welfare, and some appeared desensitised towards the vulnerabilities of detained people. There were occasions where they would use the phrase “if he dies, he dies”.

Staff used derogatory language as a way to “fit in”.

The inquiry was set up to investigate the mistreatment of individuals detained at Brook House between April and August 2017, following a BBC Panorama programme which showed covert footage of mistreatment. At the time, the centre was operated by G4S on behalf of the Home Office.

Toxic culture

What is organisational culture?

McDonald’s: why zero-tolerance policies don’t work

Can HR turn around a toxic working culture?

The inquiry identified 19 incidents that amounted to mistreatment contrary to Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which protects individuals from inhumane, degrading treatment or punishment.

These included inappropriate use of force, inflicting unnecessary pain, dangerous restraint techniques including gripping a man’s neck, making inappropriate and humiliating comments to two detainees who attempted suicide, and initially failing to help a detainee after a suicide attempt.

The Brook House Inquiry rejected suggestions by the Home Office and G4S that the events primarily resulted from the behaviour of a small minority of staff.

Inquiry chair Kate Eves said: “What I have heard in the course of this inquiry does not support this. It is a narrative that seeks to distance both organisations from their responsibility for the prevailing culture at the time.”

Instead, the inquiry found that many of the issues stemmed from a “troubling tendency to pay only superficial attention to the rules”.

Healthcare staff did not sufficiently understand their safeguarding responsibilities, particularly in relation to the use of force, and were “too quick to dismiss difficult or challenging behaviour as disobedience rather than an indication of mental ill-health,” said Eves.

Some of the staff who worked at Brook House, which is now operated by Serco, are still employed there.

“It inevitably casts doubt on how far the cultural changes described by Serco can be said to have been embedded. There is more to do,” Eves said.

Staffing issues

She said there was “significant understaffing at Brook House, an issue that both the Home Office and G4S were aware of”.

The senior management team was said to be dysfunctional and not visible to junior staff, who were left to manage complex situations without support. This was compounded by “in-fighting” among the management team, and a gulf between managers and staff on the ground.

Employees at Brook House lacked trust in the whistleblowing process, and when ‘Speak Out’ posters were defaced with graffiti saying “snitches” and “don’t be a rat”, they remained up for months.

The Brook House Inquiry report says: “Several members of staff told the Inquiry that they did not report incidents for fear of being labelled a ‘grass’ or being bullied. Although the extent of whistleblowing was not entirely clear, a large number of staff at Brook House witnessed inappropriate behaviour during the relevant period but did not use Speak Out or any other process to raise concerns about that behaviour.

“Senior management showed a lack of understanding about the willingness of staff to use the processes in place and the reasons why they might not do so. The whistleblowing policy and processes themselves were inadequate, ineffective and were not adequately tailored to Brook House or [immigration removal centres] more generally. Disappointingly, when staff did raise concerns or grievances, there was often an inadequate response.”

The report makes 33 recommendations for the government and companies operating immigration removal centres including:

  • rolling out mandatory training covering mental health, race and diversity, resilience, drug awareness, trauma, and the purpose of immigration detention centres
  • ensuring that all staff are aware that the technique of handcuffing detained people with their hands behind their back while seated is not permitted, given its association with positional asphyxia
  • introducing further guidance and training for healthcare staff on the use of force
  • ensuring there are ongoing assessments of staffing levels so that there is an appropriate number of staff for the size and needs of the detained population
  • ensuring contractors operating immigration removal centres develop and implement an action plan to ensure a healthy staff culture
  • address barriers to making complaints and improving whistleblowing procedures.

A spokesperson for G4S said: “The vast majority of employees at Brook House immigration removal centre were focused on the wellbeing of the detained people and carried out their duties to a high standard, often in exceptionally challenging circumstances.

“We were appalled when, in 2017, a number of former employees acted in a way that was contrary to our values, policies and their training and for this we are sorry. This behaviour was unacceptable and the company took swift action, including dismissing a number of individuals and commissioning an independent review carried out by Verita.

“G4S ceased operating Brook House in 2020 and no longer operates any immigration removal centres.”

The Home Office said: “The abuse that took place at Brook House in 2017 was unacceptable. The government has made significant improvements since then to uphold the welfare and dignity of those detained, including strengthening safeguards, promoting a culture of transparency and improving the oversight of contractors’ performance.”

 

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

 

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Plan to extend strikes minimum service level to hospitals
next post
Right to predictable working hours receives Royal Assent

You may also like

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

University of Salford launches Better Working Lives cluster

14 May 2025

Four ways employers can reduce the risk of...

14 May 2025

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar)

8 May 2025

Eight ways to best support grieving employees

6 May 2025

Hey HR, don’t blame it on the sunshine

2 May 2025

NHS Lothian review finds ‘toxic’ work environment

2 May 2025

BBC to ‘act immediately’ on workplace culture review

28 Apr 2025

Leading with honest feedback: A responsibility in recruitment

24 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+