Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEmployee relationsEmployment lawEmployment tribunalsRedundancy

Tribunal highlights ‘bumping’ danger

by Personnel Today 1 Feb 2005
by Personnel Today 1 Feb 2005

Employers have been warned to keep an accurate paper trail during redundancy procedures after an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld an unfair dismissal claim because the employer did not consider ‘bumping’.

In the case of Lionel Leventhal Ltd v North, the EAT in London looked at whether the employer should consider ‘bumping’ – offering the employee less senior positions, whether vacant or not.

The tribunal ruled that an employer might be found to have unfairly dismissed its employee if it did not consider this, even if the alternative is a more junior position on less pay.

Katie Clark, senior associate in the employment team at law firm McDermott Will & Emery, said: “[The ruling] is saying when an employer makes redundancies, it should consider bumping. Employers need to ensure there is a paper trail so they are protected.”

The tribunal also found that an employer cannot necessarily use the employee’s failure to register an interest in less senior roles as a defence to unfair dismissal allegations.

“The employer shouldn’t just assume that a senior employee won’t accept a junior position,” Clark said. “That is when the unfairness arises. The message to employers is not to make any assumptions.”

Mary Chapman, chief executive of the Chartered Management Institute, said the point for any employer is that practices need to be fair and perceived as fair by their employees.

“Redundancy must be as a result of a genuine business decision. Employers need to be very clear and honest, and then follow the procedures through in the right manner.”

The EAT has not decided that bumping must always be looked at in order for a dismissal to be fair. However, future tribunals may find that, depending on the circumstances, it should be considered.

The limit on the amount of compensation for unfair dismissal increases from £55,000 to £56,800 this week.

Go to www.personneltoday.com/25709.article for more on redundancy procedures

Questions to ask when considering ‘bumping’

– Are there any vacancies, even if in less senior positions?

– How different are the roles?

– What is the difference in remuneration?

– What are the respective lengths of service of the two employees?- What qualifications does the ‘at risk’ employee have?

– Would the other employee take voluntary redundancy?

Source: McDermott Will & Emery



Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Rising house prices make compulsory pension saving impractical
next post
CIPD hopes new document will raise its profile

You may also like

Green jobs: are there shoots of growth on...

29 Jun 2022

Law protecting frontline workers against violence takes effect

28 Jun 2022

Postal workers and doctors threaten strikes over pay

28 Jun 2022

Heathrow-based cabin crew set for 18% pay rise

28 Jun 2022

Attracting diverse young talent to the ‘secret’ world...

28 Jun 2022

Four-day week: what are the legal considerations for...

28 Jun 2022

Hire quality vs speed: Finding the perfect balance...

28 Jun 2022

Gender pay gap ‘won’t close until 2151’

27 Jun 2022

Third of employees living ‘payday to payday’

27 Jun 2022

PwC to award inflation-busting pay increase

27 Jun 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more
  • Strathclyde Business School expands its Degree Apprenticeship offer in England PROMOTED | The University of Strathclyde is expanding its programmes...Read more
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+