Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee relationsEmployment lawLatest NewsEmployment tribunalsRedundancy

Tribunal highlights ‘bumping’ danger

by Personnel Today 1 Feb 2005
by Personnel Today 1 Feb 2005

Employers have been warned to keep an accurate paper trail during redundancy procedures after an Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) upheld an unfair dismissal claim because the employer did not consider ‘bumping’.

In the case of Lionel Leventhal Ltd v North, the EAT in London looked at whether the employer should consider ‘bumping’ – offering the employee less senior positions, whether vacant or not.

The tribunal ruled that an employer might be found to have unfairly dismissed its employee if it did not consider this, even if the alternative is a more junior position on less pay.

Katie Clark, senior associate in the employment team at law firm McDermott Will & Emery, said: “[The ruling] is saying when an employer makes redundancies, it should consider bumping. Employers need to ensure there is a paper trail so they are protected.”

The tribunal also found that an employer cannot necessarily use the employee’s failure to register an interest in less senior roles as a defence to unfair dismissal allegations.

“The employer shouldn’t just assume that a senior employee won’t accept a junior position,” Clark said. “That is when the unfairness arises. The message to employers is not to make any assumptions.”

Mary Chapman, chief executive of the Chartered Management Institute, said the point for any employer is that practices need to be fair and perceived as fair by their employees.

“Redundancy must be as a result of a genuine business decision. Employers need to be very clear and honest, and then follow the procedures through in the right manner.”

The EAT has not decided that bumping must always be looked at in order for a dismissal to be fair. However, future tribunals may find that, depending on the circumstances, it should be considered.

The limit on the amount of compensation for unfair dismissal increases from £55,000 to £56,800 this week.

Go to www.personneltoday.com/25709.article for more on redundancy procedures

Questions to ask when considering ‘bumping’

– Are there any vacancies, even if in less senior positions?

– How different are the roles?

– What is the difference in remuneration?

– What are the respective lengths of service of the two employees?- What qualifications does the ‘at risk’ employee have?

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

– Would the other employee take voluntary redundancy?

Source: McDermott Will & Emery



Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Rising house prices make compulsory pension saving impractical
next post
CIPD hopes new document will raise its profile

You may also like

One in seven ‘revenge quit’ in latest employee...

7 Jul 2025

Skills shortfall in construction threatens housing target

4 Jul 2025

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

MPs demand Home Office tightens visas to protect...

4 Jul 2025

It’s all about the Monet: how art transforms...

3 Jul 2025

Stop chasing quick fixes: return to the office...

3 Jul 2025

Asda hails major upgrade in employees’ benefits

3 Jul 2025

100% success for latest large-scale four-day week trial

3 Jul 2025

NHS 10-year Health Plan sets out vision for...

3 Jul 2025

Microsoft to cut 9,000 jobs globally as role...

3 Jul 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+