Uber application to send case straight to Supreme Court is refused

Uber’s application to “leapfrog” an appeal to the Supreme Court has been refused.

It follows last month’s Employment Appeal Tribunal dismissal of the cab hailing company’s appeal in the case of Uber v Aslam.

The EAT confirmed that Uber drivers were workers and should therefore claim basic workers’ rights such as sickness and holiday pay.

Uber then applied for permission to bypass the Court of Appeal, which would typically be the next step, and send its appeal straight to the Supreme Court. This type of exception is only granted in a small minority of important cases.

This application has been refused, and the appeal will be heard by the Court of Appeal some time next year.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

Email(Required)

OptOut

From time to time, we will send you emails about selected products, events and services from Personnel Today and OHW+ - but you can choose to opt-out at any time. If you do not wish to receive these emails, please tick this box.

Name

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Δ

The Supreme Court will hear another employment status case early next year, however, when Pimlico Plumbers appeals against a decision that one of its plumbers who had signed a self-employment contract is in fact a worker.

This case will see the highest court in the UK make a decision on employment status, so will be watched with interest.