Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawDisciplineLatest NewsIndustrial action / strikesDiscipline and grievances

Unison to appeal against trade union detriment ruling

by Ashleigh Webber 4 Apr 2022
by Ashleigh Webber 4 Apr 2022 Unison general secretary Christina McAnea
PoliPix UK / Alamy
Unison general secretary Christina McAnea
PoliPix UK / Alamy

A recent Court of Appeal ruling that confirmed UK legislation does not protect striking employees from action short of dismissal has ‘given bosses the green light to discipline staff who strike’, a union has claimed.

Unison said employers may feel “emboldened to mistreat employees” who take part in organised strikes following the recent Mercer v Alternative Future Group & Another judgment. It said it would lodge an appeal against the ruling.

The case involved a trade union representative Ms Mercer, who was suspended by care provider Alternative Futures Group after taking part in a strike over cuts to pay for sleep-in shifts.

She took a claim for detriment to an employment tribunal and was unsuccessful, but succeeded on appeal at the Employment Appeal Tribunal.

Unison argued on her behalf that Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights – incorporated into UK law by the Human Rights Act 1998 – protects workers who take industrial action against their employer. The union said this meant they should not be disciplined or treated unfairly because they had taken part in industrial action, which the EAT agreed with.

Trade union detriment

Trade union detriment: action short of dismissal is legal, finds Court of Appeal

Ryanair pilots’ trade union detriment case over first hurdle

Disciplinary action against union reps – handle with care

However, business secretary Kwasi Kwarteng intervened in the case and took an appeal against the EAT’s decision to the Court of Appeal. This resulted in the EAT’s ruling being overturned.

The government’s intervention means that a loophole in protection for striking workers continues, Unison claims. This is because the tribunal found the Trade Union Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was incompatible with international human rights law.

Unison general secretary Christina McAnea said: “Bad bosses will be rubbing their hands with glee. This backwards step gives employers the green light to target staff who stand up to them.

“Employees only get involved in disputes at work as a last resort. But they often have little other option when employers behave badly.

“The court should have been much bolder, particularly after its own judgment said that a failure to protect striking workers could put the UK in breach of international human rights law. P&O Ferries’ appalling sacking of hundreds of workers demonstrates that UK employment law is no deterrent.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“The effect of this decision will be that employees will be fearful of challenging unfair treatment. The government should be protecting their rights, not undermining them.”

HR Director opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more HR director jobs

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Employment Bill could face further delay
next post
Airlines and ports hit by staff shortages

You may also like

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

NHS pay disputes: Who could strike again?

20 Jun 2025

Poundland closures mean over 1,000 jobs at risk

18 Jun 2025

HR and employment leaders feature in King’s birthday...

16 Jun 2025

Former employees of Wilko gain £2m payout

13 Jun 2025

Workplace disputes: ‘Most employment tribunals could be avoided’

12 Jun 2025

Nurses vote on whether 3.6% pay rise is...

9 Jun 2025

House of Lords to resume scrutiny of Employment...

30 May 2025

Black workers face greatest risk from workplace surveillance

30 May 2025

Streeting appeals to resident doctors to vote against...

29 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+