Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Legal Q&AEmployment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionAge discriminationHealth insurance

Weekly dilemma: Insurance benefits for older workers

by Personnel Today 21 Jan 2008
by Personnel Today 21 Jan 2008

We have just had a quote for renewing our medical insurance policy. We have several workers aged over 65 and if we cover them too, the overall cost increases substantially. Can we exclude these workers from the insurance?

First, a practical point – many group insurance schemes do not have any age criteria, so the problem may be solved simply by changing insurers. Otherwise, the legal implications of excluding older workers need to be considered.

Withdrawing any contractual benefit without the employee’s consent amounts to a breach of contract, which could result in constructive and unfair dismissal claims. However, employment contracts often state that certain benefits are discretionary and, where the wording permits, they can usually be withdrawn or changed without the employee’s consent.

Withdrawing benefits from staff aged over 65 will be discriminatory under the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, unless this can be objectively justified as ‘a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim’.

It is unclear whether cost considerations alone can comprise a legitimate aim to justify discrimination. Case law suggests that it can only be considered along with other justifications (if there are any). The government’s Coming of Age (July 2005) consultation suggested that while factors such as business needs and efficiency may be legitimate, discrimination is not justified merely because it may be more expensive not to. Hopefully, case law will clarify this question.

If you do withdraw insurance benefits for older workers, the recent tribunal case of Bloxham v Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer illustrates the need to consult thoroughly and document the reasons for doing so. You must consider whether other, less discriminatory steps can be taken – weighing up all available options and then documenting a comparative analysis of the costs of providing the benefit to all employees against other options, such as different insurance providers, or even withdrawing the benefit from all employees.

If the benefit is contractual and you decide to withdraw it, you will need your employees’ agreement. Paying staff to buy their own insurance privately appears attractive, but it risks claims of indirect age discrimination from older workers whose private insurance will cost more than that of their younger colleagues.

Laurence Rees, partner, Reed Smith Richards Butler

Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Emergency time off to care for dependants
next post
Making takeovers easier to swallow

You may also like

Davos hears that ‘wages can rise’ without creating...

26 May 2022

Employers lack data to make IR35 worker status...

25 May 2022

Maternity leave: Cost of living crisis highlights need...

25 May 2022

Employees resigning in 2022: Survey shows ‘great resignation’...

24 May 2022

Aspers casino cashier excluded by colleagues wins £75k...

23 May 2022

Women in FTSE 350 leadership: ‘A lot of...

20 May 2022

City firms pledge to improve social mobility in...

20 May 2022

One in five employers planning ‘no jab no...

19 May 2022

How should HR handle the highest inflation in...

18 May 2022

Ethnic diversity: report highlights disparities in school leadership

18 May 2022
  • Strathclyde Business School expands its Degree Apprenticeship offer in England PROMOTED | The University of Strathclyde is expanding its programmes...Read more
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+