Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawData protectionHR practice

Weekly dilemma: Subject access requests

by Personnel Today 15 Jun 2011
by Personnel Today 15 Jun 2011

I’ve received a letter from a current employee in which she asks for details of all personal information the company holds on her. Do I have to send her everything? What if some of the material also has information about other employees? Can she ask for information to be removed from her personnel file?

Employees have a legal right to make a “subject access request” under the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA). This applies to information about living identifiable people (personal data) including that held in personnel records and obtained through employee monitoring.

The DPA regulates the way that personal data can be processed (ie collected, recorded, used, stored and distributed) and it gives individuals rights to access their personal data, and compensation should things go wrong. The DPA applies to computerised information (including emails, word documents and CCTV records) as well as structured manual records (ie organised filing systems where individual data can be easily located and identified).

Access to this information must be granted when an employee requests it, but you may charge a £10 fee for providing the information and you have 40 days in which to provide it from the date that payment is received.

You are right to be concerned about releasing information relating to other employees and you may be exempt from disclosing it, as it could potentially breach other employees’ right to have their data held securely under the DPA. You should consider redacting information that relates to other employees, or ask for their consent before releasing it. If, after removing information relating to other employees, it is still clear who is being described, then you may be exempt from disclosing it, depending on the circumstances – if the information is sensitive personal data, for example.

You can also, by agreement with the employee, narrow the scope of his or her request should it appears to be particularly wide ranging. In any event, information held in unstructured paper files, eg a document held by a manager in his desk drawer or a note in a supervisor’s diary, is not covered by the DPA.

If obtaining the information is particularly burdensome, you may be exempt from complying with the request, but this can only be justified by reference to the cost of gathering the information, the time it takes, the resources you have and the difficulty of obtaining the information. Remember that almost all personal data held electronically is potentially disclosable.

Other exemptions from data that can be released are:



  • information contained in management forecasting and workforce planning;
  • corporate financial information;
  • information covered by legal professional privilege;
  • information relating to negotiations with the individual; and
  • references given to you by a previous employer in confidence.


The employee could object to you holding or using information about them if it causes them distress or harm. If so, delete the information and stop using it in the manner complained about, unless you have a compelling reason to continue.

Employees have a right to claim compensation should they suffer as a result of a breach of the DPA, so it is in your interests to make sure that you respond to the subject access request adequately, as well as within the 40 day time limit.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Jenny Owens, associate solicitor, Weightmans LLP








XpertHR FAQs



  • What rights of access do employees have to job references?
  • Do job applicants have the right to see notes made on them at interview?
  • Can an employer hold an unsuccessful candidate’s CV on file in case a further job vacancy arises?

Personnel Today

previous post
Legal opinion: Internships – cheap labour or career opportunity?
next post
UK’s skills gap worsens

You may also like

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

With HR absence rising, is your people team...

24 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Lawyers warn over impact of Employment Rights Bill...

13 Jun 2025

Racism claims have tripled and ‘Equality Act is...

12 Jun 2025

CIPD Festival of Work: ‘Wellbeing is not an...

11 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for...

6 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+