Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

BonusesCorporate governanceLatest NewsESGExecutive pay

Firms with female directors most likely to cut pandemic executive pay

by Ashleigh Webber 19 Apr 2022
by Ashleigh Webber 19 Apr 2022 Shutterstock
Shutterstock

Companies with high levels of female representation on boards were more likely to cut executive pay in response to the economic shock caused by Covid-19, research has found.

Analysis by the High Pay Centre, the Open University, the University of Nottingham and Western University in Canada found that fewer than half of listed organisations cut executive pay amid the economic uncertainty.

Of the 216 listed firms looked at for the Corporate Britain and Covid-19 report, just 104 took at least one measure to reduce executive pay. At the same time, almost a quarter of FTSE 350 companies were taking advantage of the government’s furlough scheme.

Prior to the pandemic, average pay, including bonuses, for a typical FTSE 100 CEO stood at around £4.5 million, nearly 150 times the pay of the median full-time worker in the UK, according to previous High Pay Centre research.

Seventy-eight cut base salaries or cancelled pay rises, while 29 reduced or scrapped bonus payments. Fifty firms cut executives’ salaries by 10-20%, while 11 reduced salaries by more than 50%.

The majority of those that cut executive remuneration packages did so to show solidarity with lower-earning workers, or to control costs.

Executive pay

Executive pay: financial incentives damage long-term profits

Large firms face increasing pressure to tackle executive pay and diversity

The researchers looked at statements that were issued to the Regulatory News Service between March and May 2020, when the UK was in lockdown, thousands were on furlough, and the majority of the workforce worked from home. Banks and financial firms were excluded from the analysis because the Bank of England called for reductions in bonus payments for senior staff in light of the pandemic.

Firms with more female directors and higher proportions of share ownership by institutional investors were more likely to cut executive pay.  Some firms had a higher level of reduction for certain directors (for example CEOs and chairmen) or reduced compensation of executive directors only.

However, it concludes that as the average base salary for a FTSE 100 CEO stood at £954,000 in 2020 with various bonus payments and share award schemes averaging a value of over £2 million, “a three-month, 10%-20% reduction in base salary does not represent a meaningful reduction in executive pay or saving for the company.”

“It then follows that if greater institutional ownership or female representation on boards delivered only minor reductions in executive pay, other measures – for example greater worker involvement in ownership and strategic decisionmaking – may be necessary to deliver truly responsible businesses fully aligned with the interests of wider society,” the report says.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

High Pay Centre director Luke Hildyard said: “If pay cuts are a sign of social awareness/responsibility and more commonplace at firms with more diverse boards, this might incline socially responsible investors to encourage greater diversity.”

Reward, compensation and benefits opportunities


Browse all comp and benefits jobs

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Businesses plead for free or cheaper Covid-19 tests
next post
Government seeks evidence on mental ill-health prevention and treatment

You may also like

Ofgem workers ballot for strike action

2 May 2025

What will reward look like in 2035?

28 Apr 2025

NI increase has not caused ‘knee-jerk reaction’ in...

23 Apr 2025

Post-pandemic starters seek more pay for on-site working

10 Apr 2025

Maisie Adam to host Employee Benefits Awards 2025

3 Apr 2025

Most businesses will need to adjust wages in...

28 Mar 2025

‘British people too polite to talk about salary?...

28 Mar 2025

Senior HR pay rising faster than junior roles

28 Mar 2025

Employee Benefits Awards 2025 shortlist revealed

24 Mar 2025

New rules from April on neonatal leave and...

21 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+