Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Equality, diversity and inclusionOpinion

Flexible working and the Equalities Review: head to head

by Personnel Today 13 Mar 2007
by Personnel Today 13 Mar 2007

The Equalities Review has prompted huge debate on diversity in the workplace (Personnel Today, 6 March). But is changing your work culture so that more employees can work flexibly really good for business? Two experts argue their case.



FOR: Flexibility is good for business
Norma Jarboe, director, Opportunity Now


I strongly believe that equality and diversity are business-critical issues. When employers develop and encourage truly diverse work cultures they can make their organisations more successful, more competitive and more dynamic. Success is what diversity in the workplace is all about, and if people see it as merely pandering to individual lifestyle choices, they are showing a lack of understanding for changing demographics and issues of human capital management.


Equality and diversity mean that both women and men can reach their full potential, while enabling employers to maximise their flexibility, innovation and customer focus. Ensuring we make the most of talent has never been more important for individuals, business or the economy. The benefits of getting this right cannot be underestimated.


There are a number of studies that show a link between gender distribution in a company’s management and its profitability. Research from the US shows companies with the highest representation of women on their top management teams delivered more than 35% higher return on equity and 34% higher total return to shareholders than companies with the lowest representation.


Reducing gender segregation and increasing women’s employment generally could benefit the UK economy by up to £23bn, equivalent to 2% gross national product.


Research shows there is already a skills shortage, with 11% of employees considered by their employers to be less than proficient in their job. Employers already identify major skills gaps in communication, customer handling, and teamworking. Is it that the skills aren’t out there, or that they not being used because job roles are still not designed with flexibility at their heart?


Some 5.6 million women and men who work part-time are working below their full potential – one in five of the working population of the UK. Five in every 10 part-timers have previously held a job requiring a higher level of skills, qualifications, or more management responsibility.


I believe the provision of more flexible roles is a key step forward in creating more inclusive workplaces and, significantly, a way of addressing the need for talent. If organisations are to benefit from the best available people then flexibility in job design will become a must, not a nice-to-do. Organisations that have taken this message to heart are reaping the rewards.


BT, one of our corporate champions, estimates that its flexible work culture has saved it more than £510m per year in office costs, while its homeworkers are on average 20% more productive than their office-based colleagues.


Moving to a flexible work culture is not easy or straightforward and demands commitment, dedication and leadership. But making flexibility the norm rather than an irritant could be a win-win for all. We cannot as a society adopt a stance that mitigates against women having a career and a family.



AGAINST: Flexibility is bad for business
Lesley Nash, managing director, Changework Now


“A partnered mother with a child aged under 11 is 45% less likely to be in work than a partnered man,” the Equalities Review says. Why, in spite of all the legislation that threatens businesses small and large alike, does this tend to be the case?


Can it really be that businesses, if they are to survive in the competitive environment, want, prefer and maybe even need to hire staff who will make the best and fullest contribution possible? Staff who can focus on the job in hand 100% because it is of primary importance to them, and who are willing and able to do what it takes to get the job done?


At Changework Now [a technology-based HR consultancy] I need staff who are able to work full time (yes, full time), and sometimes more, because they put the customer first. My customers expect excellent service and for our organisation to go the extra mile. I can’t provide that unless our people are willing and happy to go the extra mile, too. Customers don’t care if we have childcare issues, whether we are fully staffed, or whether we have people on short- or long-term sickness they just want a good job delivered.


For starters, mothers with children under 11, whose work is not of primary importance, are likely to have at least three times the amount of sickness: once if they are sick, twice if the child is sick, and three times if the childminder is sick. Mothers who view their work as highly important will often go the extra mile themselves to balance the needs of the two. Can I afford to run a business with employees who can’t or won’t balance the two? No, I cannot.


The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development predicts that staff will soon resent the privileges given to parents and carers. But this is happening already.


The changes in maternity and paternity leave mean more time off work, but the government says the cost to businesses will be “quite small” (up to £70m). Any extra time off our people take increases the burden on others and costs money because I have fewer people producing the outcome that the client demands.


It’s not ‘one size fits all’ as the government in its heavy-handed and blunt way seems to think.


Legislating that people have a right to request non-standard working hours and locations puts many employers in a difficult position. Some types of organisation may have roles that lend themselves to part-time and/or homeworking. We don’t and it is shocking that the ‘organisation’ is treated as guilty until proven otherwise.


I feel even sorrier for large organisations, which many people think are big enough for these things not to make a difference. That’s rubbish. It does – no matter how big or small you are. Employees need to be ‘fit for purpose’ just as much as our products and services need to be. Let’s stop pretending otherwise.e_SClB”A partnered mother with a child aged under 11 is 45% less likely to be in work than a partnered man,” the Equalities Review says. Why, in spite of all the legislation that threatens businesses small and large alike, does this tend to be the case?


Can it really be that businesses, if they are to survive in the competitive environment, want, prefer and maybe even need to hire staff who will make the best and fullest contribution possible? Staff who can focus on the job in hand 100% because it is of primary importance to them, and who are willing and able to do what it takes to get the job done?


At Changework Now [a technology-based HR consultancy] I need staff who are able to work full time (yes, full time), and sometimes more, because they put the customer first. My customers expect excellent service and for our organisation to go the extra mile. I can’t provide that unless our people are willing and happy to go the extra mile, too. Customers don’t care if we have childcare issues, whether we are fully staffed, or whether we have people on short- or long-term sickness they just want a good job delivered.


For starters, mothers with children under 11, whose work is not of primary importance, are likely to have at least three times the amount of sickness: once if they are sick, twice if the child is sick, and three times if the childminder is sick. Mothers who view their work as highly important will often go the extra mile themselves to balance the needs of the two. Can I afford to run a business with employees who can’t or won’t balance the two? No, I cannot.


The Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development predicts that staff will soon resent the privileges given to parents and carers. But this is happening already.


The changes in maternity and paternity leave mean more time off work, but the government says the cost to businesses will be “quite small” (up to £70m). Any extra time off our people take increases the burden on others and costs money because I have fewer people producing the outcome that the client demands.


It’s not ‘one size fits all’ as the government in its heavy-handed and blunt way seems to think.


Legislating that people have a right to request non-standard working hours and locations puts many employers in a difficult position. Some types of organisation may have roles that lend themselves to part-time and/or homeworking. We don’t and it is shocking that the ‘organisation’ is treated as guilty until proven otherwise.


I feel even sorrier for large organisations, which many people think are big enough for these things not to make a difference. That’s rubbish. It does – no matter how big or small you are. Employees need to be ‘fit for purpose’ just as much as our products and services need to be. Let’s stop pretending otherwise.


Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

What do you think?


E-mail your views to [email protected]

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Obesity and the workplace: a focus on fattism and weight discrimination
next post
Employers Forum on Age warns national minimum wage band for younger workers is ageist

You may also like

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

Culture, ‘micro-incivilities’ and invisible talent

14 May 2025

Why fighting the DEI backlash is about PR...

9 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

Rethinking talent: Who was never considered in the...

7 May 2025

Reform UK councils’ staff face WFH ban

6 May 2025

Eight ways to best support grieving employees

6 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+