Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Employee relationsEquality, diversity and inclusionLatest NewsEconomics, government & businessEmployment tribunals

Discrimination payouts in employment tribunals continue to fall…

by Mark Crail 7 Aug 2007
by Mark Crail 7 Aug 2007

The compensation paid by employers who discriminated against employees fell by almost £1m last year, as the number of successful employment tribunal claims decreased for the second year in a row.

But the median tribunal award remained almost unchanged, dropping from £7,567 in 2005 to £7,500 in 2006, according to an analysis of employment tribunal judgments by Personnel Today’s sister publication, Equal Opportunities Review.

Researchers analysed 313 awards under sex, race and disability discrimination laws and the 2003 regulations covering discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation and religious belief.

In all, employers were ordered to pay a total of £4,150,225, rising with interest to £4,295,160. Payouts, including interest, totalled £5.2m in 2005, and £6.2m in 2004.

The research shows that although there was little change in the typical overall payout in each case, compensation awards in some jurisdictions had moved considerably over the year.

Race discrimination compensation awards fell from a median (or midpoint) figure of £8,270 to £5,302 between 2005 and 2006, while disability discrimination awards rose from £8,373 to £9,840.

But the new jurisdictions introduced by the 2003 regulations were the most volatile – in part reflecting the relatively small number of claims dealt with so far.

The median compensation award for religious discrimination fell from £6,010 in 2005 to £1,550 in 2006. Awards for sexual orientation discrimination rose from a median £3,500 to £11,561, taking this from the lowest to the highest level of payout for a single jurisdiction.

Compensation awards were highest in combined jurisdictions, where awards were made for a single case in which there had been discrimination in more than one jurisdiction.

Total awards include a sum for financial loss, injury to feelings, aggravated damages, personal injury and any uplift made to reflect an employer’s failure to follow the statutory disciplinary and grievance procedures.

… and employment tribunals say most injury to feelings is only relatively minor

More than half the awards made by employment tribunals in respect of injury to feelings in discrimination cases fell into the least serious category recognised by the law, the research shows.

In Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police v Vento (No.2), the Court of Appeal laid down guidelines for injury to feelings awards that defined three bands reflecting the seriousness of the case. These were:

  • A top band – normally between £15,000 and £25,000 for cases involving lengthy campaigns of discriminatory harassment
  • A middle band – running from £5,000 to £15,000, for serious cases and
  • A lower band – from £500 to £5,000, for less serious cases, such as where the act of discrimination was an isolated or one-off incident.

Analysis of the 313 discrimination awards made in 2006 found that 167 (53%) included payments in the lowest band, with a further 84 (27%) in the middle band. There were only nine awards (3%) in the top band. But a further 53 (17%) gave no breakdown.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The median figure for compensation in respect of injury to feelings was £4,875 for all cases, ranging from £1,550 in cases about religious discrimination to £9,900 for cases in which there were multiple jurisdictions.

Mark Crail

Mark Crail worked on XpertHR from 2001 until 2020, most recently as content director. He led the salary survey and HR data benchmarking services, overseeing the collection and publication of pay data through the Job Pricing tool and its wider HR research programme which forms the core of XpertHR Benchmarking.

previous post
CBI research shows manufacturing job losses at lowest rate for two years
next post
Sector skills councils directory

You may also like

Day one rights in the Employment Rights Bill...

28 Aug 2025

EHRC acts on policies flouting law on single-sex...

28 Aug 2025

Medical profession more ableist than wider society: BMA

28 Aug 2025

Lotus to cut 550 jobs to secure sustainable...

28 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Workplace culture (larger...

28 Aug 2025

City law firm freezes junior lawyers’ pay to...

28 Aug 2025

FCA issues clarity on workplace savings schemes to...

27 Aug 2025

MoD worker loses harassment claim over lack of...

27 Aug 2025

Acas to explore use of AI as half...

27 Aug 2025

TUC calls for ‘step change’ as half worry...

27 Aug 2025

  • Work smart – stay well: Avoid unnecessary pain with centred ergonomics SPONSORED | If you often notice...Read more
  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise