Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee relationsIndustrial action / strikesEmployment tribunalsTrade unions

Dismissing unofficial strikers: Shoot first and ask questions later?

by Personnel Today 3 Aug 2009
by Personnel Today 3 Aug 2009

A recent ruling has clarified the employer’s position when dismissing unofficial strikers.

HR professionals should know that employees who are dismissed while participating in an unofficial strike or unofficial industrial action are barred from claiming unfair dismissal under section 237 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. Industrial action will be deemed unofficial if it is not authorised or endorsed by a trade union.

Gate Gourmet

Some issues relating to this exclusion from the right to claim unfair dismissal were explored recently by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) in the conjoined appeals of several staff who had been dismissed in August 2005 during a period of unofficial industrial action against Gate Gourmet, which supplied in-flight food to British Airways. While the claims of each of the appellants had failed before the employment tribunal and their appeals also failed before the EAT, three appeals gave rise to interesting issues:

One employee did not attend work for two days of the strike but “kept his head down”. He was dismissed when he attempted to return to work on the third day. As he was trying to return to work, he was not participating in unofficial action at the time of his dismissal. He was therefore able to claim unfair dismissal.

However, the original tribunal held that his dismissal for not working on the first two days was fair, and the EAT agreed. The EAT held that, while the withdrawal by an employee of his labour will not necessarily justify dismissal in every case, it is within the range of reasonable responses to dismiss an employee where he deliberately absents himself in a manner plainly liable to do serious damage to the employer’s business. It also held that nothing in the case law from the European Court of Human Rights or the European Court of Justice on the right to strike deprives employers of the right to dismiss employees for having participated in unofficial action.

Union official

Another employee, who was a trade union official, was found to have participated in the unofficial action by virtue of his attendance at a staff meeting in a canteen. His appeal failed. The employment tribunal was entitled, as a matter of fact, to decide that the union official had participated in the industrial action as those present in the canteen meeting, when they had been dismissed, were participating in the unofficial action by virtue of their refusal to continue their work. The employee’s status as a union official did not exempt him from that conclusion.

The approach that the employer had taken in this case was described by the EAT as “shoot first and ask questions later”. This clearly has its attractions for an employer: it means that the unofficial action is dealt with speedily and it gives the employer the best chance of taking advantage of the exclusion from the right to claim unfair dismissal of those dismissed while participating in unofficial action. Furthermore, an employer need not follow any sort of procedure if the dismissal takes place while the employee is participating in unofficial action. Indeed, in this particular EAT case, each of the claims of unfair dismissal failed at tribunal and each of the appeals against those decisions also failed.

Nonetheless, this decision serves as a useful reminder to employers that they can only rely upon the exclusion from bringing unfair dismissal claims if: the strike or industrial action in question is unofficial, by virtue of it not being authorised or endorsed by the relevant union; and, equally as important: the employee can be shown to have been participating in the action at the time of dismissal â€“ rather than, for example, being absent from work due to illness.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Key points



  • If employees strike, go slow, work to rule or take other forms of industrial action they can be dismissed without the risk of unfair dismissal claims.
  • This only applies if employees are dismissed when taking part in action that is not endorsed or authorised by a trade union.
  • It does not apply if they are â€“ at the time â€“ on holiday or on sick leave or trying to return to work.

Charles Wynn-Evans, head of employment, Dechert

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Absence management hit by substandard record-keeping
next post
Excercise fails to move UK adults

You may also like

Public sector workers gain pay rises of up...

22 May 2025

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Ryanair demands flight attendants pay back salary increase

21 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Minister defends Employment Rights Bill at Acas conference

16 May 2025

CBI chair Soames accuses ministers of not listening...

16 May 2025

Union rep teacher awarded £370k for unfair dismissal

15 May 2025

Tribunal finds need for degree in redundancy selection...

14 May 2025

‘Polygamous working’ is a minefield for HR

14 May 2025

Nurses threaten strikes if pay demands not met

12 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+