Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsGig economyEmployment contractsHolidays and holiday payTrade unions

Bounds Taxis drivers are workers, tribunal finds

by Ashleigh Webber 22 Sep 2021
by Ashleigh Webber 22 Sep 2021 Stock photo. Shutterstock.
Stock photo. Shutterstock.

Drivers at a Northampton-based taxi firm who were required to wear uniforms, drive branded cars and log on to an app in order to accept jobs have won the right to be recognised as workers.

The employment tribunal’s ruling in the Bounds Taxis case is the latest to affect the gig economy.  It follows the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in the Uber vs Aslam case, handed down in February,  where the court ruled Uber drivers were workers entitled to rights including holiday pay and the national minimum wage whenever they had the Uber app switched on.

Two drivers, Mr Shah and Mr Adjei, brought a claim against United Travel Group, which traded as Bounds Taxis, arguing that they should be recognised as workers entitled to rest breaks and paid holiday.

The respondent argued that the drivers were self-employed as it merely provided an app called “iCabbie” for a fixed fee of £175 per week to enable them to receive jobs. The app rental fee is non-negotiable and applies regardless of the hours worked. If a driver fails to pay the fee they have to pay a £10 penalty for each day they fail to pay.

If they did not log in to the app, they could not receive jobs for Bounds Taxis. They were not allowed to accept jobs outside the app and if they missed a particular job or declined it, they would be logged off the app for a period of time.

Employment status

Labour launches plan for a single status of ‘worker’

Deliveroo drivers remain self-employed, appeal court rules

Employment Bill: What now for workers’ rights?

The drivers were also required to attend an onboarding session at the Bounds office. If a driver failed to attend, they could not obtain work through the app until they had completed the induction.

There were penalties for not wearing a Bounds Taxis uniform or displaying Bounds branding on their cars. If they failed to do so, they would be logged off the app and therefore unable to work. This was policed via spot checks which also considered the cleanliness of their vehicles.

Bounds set the fares for jobs, and drivers had no control over these. Drivers had to accept discounts that were being marketed by Bounds, which took a percentage of all the fares.

The tribunal heard that drivers were expected to accept jobs once they had logged on to the app. If they did not, the driver would be penalised. Drivers were not able to provide a substitute if they could not complete a job.

At the tribunal hearing, Bounds argued that it provided a service – the app – for drivers under a contract, and that a separate contract between the driver and passenger arose when a driver accepted a job.

It said that drivers could work when they wished and were under no obligation to accept work,  nor was the company under an obligation to offer any. However there was some element of control for “commercial reasons”.

Employment judge Robin Postle found that the respondent’s evidence was largely “unhelpful, disingenuous and evasive”.

The judge said: “The reality of the situation was that the respondents controlled the drivers to such a degree [that] there was clearly an overarching contract between the parties.

“The fact that the claimants may have represented themselves as self-employed is irrelevant. It is clear from the factual basis that each driver had no choice, that was imposed upon them by the respondents no doubt to avoid any potential employer-employee obligations.”

He said the fact that drivers needed to pay a £175 fee for the app meant they did not have substantial autonomy and independence, as they needed to log into the app in order to make the regular payment economically viable for them.

The tribunal ruled that the drivers were workers “without doubt”.

Claimant Shaqat Shah, who is also chair of App Drivers & Couriers Union (ADCU) Northampton branch, said:“I am so pleased and relieved that Bounds drivers are now finally recognised as the workers we always were. The era of brutal exploitation in the local minicab trade must come to an end but Northampton City Council, who both license Bounds and use its services, must no longer turn a blind eye to the abuse that has gone on for too long.”

Yaseen Aslam, president of ADCU, said: “This case once again proves that the problem of worker abuse in the private hire sector is widespread and deeply rooted in an industry that employs more than 250,000 people nationwide. The ADCU will not hesitate to protect our members wherever they may be and there will be plenty more similar cases to come. If the government will not enforce the law to protect the most vulnerable workers in this trade, then we will.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Bounds Taxis has been contacted for comment.

HR Director opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more HR director jobs

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Employers return £1.3 billion in furlough cash
next post
Pret A Manger to hire 3,000 more workers

You may also like

How can businesses build protections for gig workers?

7 May 2025

Uber drivers experience ‘false autonomy’ over work

16 Apr 2025

Home Office reveals employers’ costly right-to-work mistakes

7 Apr 2025

New right to work checks put onus on...

3 Apr 2025

Close loopholes that let rogue firms undercut best...

3 Mar 2025

‘Freelance’ apps warned they could be breaking law

28 Jan 2025

Deliveroo, Just Eat and Uber face calls for...

20 Jan 2025

Bolt drivers win worker status at tribunal

8 Nov 2024

McDonald’s accused of threatening Uber Eats drivers

28 Oct 2024

Lib Dems unveil 2024 election manifesto

10 Jun 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+