Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Vexatious claims

Case roundup

by Personnel Today 6 Aug 2002
by Personnel Today 6 Aug 2002

This
week’s case roundup

Keeping
up-to-date
Dent Wizard (UK) Ltd v Thomas, High Court, 2002, All ER(D) 104 (Jul)

A
company that engaged in specialist practices and relied heavily upon client
relationships had a close shave in this case, when it failed to keep its
all-important restrictive covenants in the employee contracts up to date.

Thomas
was a specialist technician with the firm, and when he requested a change in
role in 1999, the company gave him one with a much broader clientele and geographic
area.

As
a result, however, it also changed his contract, which – as with all its
employees – prevented him from undertaking similar work in his locality for six
months on leaving, and from having any contact with company clients for nine
months.  With Thomas’ broader role, the
area restriction was dropped and the limitations focused solely on his client
relationships.

When
Thomas’ role changed yet again to a localised one, no further changes were made
to his contract.

He
resigned shortly afterwards to set up in competition with Dent Wizard,
dismissing his broad restric-tive covenants as unreasonably wide and
unrepresentative of his final role.

The
company, concerned to preserve the client relationships which Thomas had built
up before leaving, sought an injunction against him.  On the facts, and to the firm’s relief, the court found that the
purpose of the restrictive covenants in Thomas’ contract was to protect the
company’s client relationships, and it allowed the injunction.

Had
the contractual restrictions been kept up to date however, a lot of uncertainty
and stress might have been avoided.

Ensuring
right to fair trial
Preedy v Smith (trading as Easterhill Furniture) and Another, EAT, 2002,
All ER(D) 56 (Jul)

Ensuring
that the right to a fair trial is not prejudiced has been the theme of a number
of EAT cases recently. Here, the tribunal once more reiterated that – even
where a party is guilty of vexatious conduct within the proceedings – the
tribunal must still satisfy itself that a fair trial could not take place as a
result, before striking out the complaint.

In
this case, and in the context of an unfair dismissal claim brought by Preedy,
the tribunal made a commonplace Directions Order, requiring exchange of witness
statements by the parties 14 days before the hearing.

Preedy’s
representative failed to comply with the order on her behalf until arrival at
the hearing. As a result, the company successfully applied for the case to be
struck out due to vexatious conduct on the part of Preedy, who then appealed.

While
the court acknowledged the difficult circumstances faced by the tribunal, it
was nonetheless vital that before taking the draconian step of striking out a
claim, the tribunal should consider the effect of vexatious conduct and whether
it impacted upon the ability to have a fair trial.

Its
failure to consider that in this instance, meant the case should fairly be
reinstated.

Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Government’s science strategy will fail say experts
next post
Pressure builds for tribunal ‘shake-up’

You may also like

Serial claimant banned after ‘weaponising’ employment tribunal system

11 Mar 2022

Worker taped to chair loses £500k unfair dismissal...

20 Jan 2022

Hotel wins record costs after claim from ‘duplicitous’...

22 Sep 2020

Job applicants with spurious intentions: what should employers...

20 Mar 2017

Trainee barrister who brought 30 employment tribunal claims...

23 Oct 2015

Serial litigant banned from further tribunal claims

3 Mar 2015

Do employment tribunal fees lead to more contentious...

14 Nov 2014

Employment tribunal costs: party’s insurance cover not a...

12 Nov 2014

Settlement agreements: practical tips on making them work

22 Oct 2014

Tribunal fees judicial review to be heard this...

7 Oct 2014
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more
  • Strathclyde Business School expands its Degree Apprenticeship offer in England PROMOTED | The University of Strathclyde is expanding its programmes...Read more
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+