Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Caste discriminationEquality, diversity and inclusionLatest NewsEthnicityRace discrimination

‘Caste’ not a protected characteristic: implications for employers

by Charlotte Allery 3 Sep 2018
by Charlotte Allery 3 Sep 2018

The government recently issued its response to a consultation on whether caste should be considered a protected characteristic for employment law purposes. Charlotte Allery from Coffin Mew looks at the implications for employers of its response.

Caste discrimination

Consultation on caste discrimination

Caste discrimination claimant awarded £183,774 in unpaid wages

Last March, the government opened a public consultation on caste discrimination, to gather views on how to ensure there is appropriate and proportionate legal protection against unlawful discrimination because of a person’s caste. In July, it published its response. So what’s next for this area of discrimination law?

What is ‘caste’?

Caste is a complex and sensitive area where even key points are disputed by different groups. The government has acknowledged that its understanding is highly polarised, meaning that establishing a universal definition is very challenging.

The explanatory notes to the Equality Act 2010 provide a definition, albeit a criticised one, which states that the term caste “denotes a hereditary, endogamous (marrying within the group) community associated with a traditional occupation and ranked accordingly on a perceived scale of ritual purity”.

The legal background

The Equality Act already covers race, protecting individuals against direct and indirect race discrimination, and harassment and victimisation on grounds of race.

Race includes colour, nationality, and ethnic or national origins. However, in 2013, the House of Lords decided that specific legal protection against discrimination because of caste should be introduced.

The government’s timetable for introducing this was delayed by a number of factors, including the 2014 case of Tirkey v Chandhok.

In this important case, Tirkey was employed as a live-in domestic servant, originally in India and later in the UK.

She was required to work seven days a week, was not allowed to sit on the same furniture as the family, had to use separate crockery and cutlery and was made to sleep on the floor. Tirkey was part of the Adivasi caste, which she claimed was a low and “servant caste”.

The employment tribunal held that caste discrimination amounts to discrimination on grounds of descent, which constitutes direct race discrimination based on ethnic origin, as prohibited by the Equality Act. The Employment Appeal Tribunal agreed, finding that caste is already protected to the extent that it is bound up with ethnic origin.

Following this decision, the government’s consultation invited views from all those potentially affected by a legal prohibition against caste discrimination, on whether legal protection against this form of discrimination was best ensured by developing the case-law under the Equality Act or by making caste explicitly an aspect of race in the Act.

The future for caste discrimination

After a review of the consultation responses, the government has decided that the best way to provide the necessary protection against unlawful caste discrimination is to rely on emerging case-law as developed by the courts and tribunals.

The main reason is the difficulty in drafting a precise legal definition of caste which avoids the potential for a variety of interpretations.

The government commented that it was “committed to minimising the risk of unintended consequences” – interpreting caste either too narrowly or too broadly could give rise to the law failing to cover some of those it is intended to protect or risk the transfer of concepts into law that it was not designed to cover.

It has also acknowledged that legislating around caste is as contentious as legislating for “social class” discrimination would be across British society more widely.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

By relying on emerging case law, the government believes that this will create less friction and help community cohesion, while ensuring the provision of protection against caste discrimination through the ethnic origin route.

The government has committed to keeping any new cases of caste discrimination under review, to ensure that the principles of Tirkey v Chandhok are upheld, regarding the interaction between caste and ethnic origin, to provide the necessary protection from caste discrimination.

Charlotte Allery

Charlotte Allery is a solicitor - commercial and employment services - at Coffin Mew

previous post
GDPR: Compliance cheat sheet for HR departments
next post
Proceeding with a disciplinary hearing when companion unavailable

You may also like

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Pay awards in real terms could fall for...

21 May 2025

Ryanair demands flight attendants pay back salary increase

21 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Uncertainty over law hampering legal use of medical...

20 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Employers ‘worryingly’ ignorant about stress risk assessments

20 May 2025

UK and EU agree to collaborate on ‘youth...

19 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+