Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

AbsenceLatest NewsHR practice

Cost of absent workers is almost nothing, claims Swansea University research

by Mike Berry 18 Aug 2006
by Mike Berry 18 Aug 2006

Workers pulling sickies are costing almost nothing to business, research from Swansea University has suggested.

The study from the university shows the cost of worker absenteeism to British industry could be as much as £13bn less than other surveys suggest.

The report, Pay, Technology, and the Cost of Worker Absence, has been put together by John Treble and his team in the School of Business and Economics.

The report has been published in US-based journal Economic Inquiry.

Earlier this year, a report by the CBI revealed the cost of sickness absence to UK employers had reached its highest-ever level. The annual study put the cost to the economy at more than £13bn.

But Professor Treble said: “There are two main reasons why we believe the cost of absence is lower than generally accepted. Firstly, not all businesses operate in the same way, which means that absenteeism may have more financial impact on some than on others.

“Secondly, the way in which we estimate the cost of absenteeism takes into account factors that the CBI survey does not. In effect, the CBI measure inflates absence costs by ignoring the extra expense that is incurred in reducing absenteeism.”

One of the key findings from the research shows that an absence in a business operating ‘just-in-time’ practices is significantly more costly than in other businesses. Such companies do not hold large quantities of semi-finished product and are, therefore, more likely to experience disruption to the flow of production caused by worker absences.

Companies that do not operate just-in-time techniques are less affected and, consequently, incur fewer costs associated with worker absence.

The report also argues that absences cannot be controlled without cost to the company. Most personnel managers invest a great deal of time and effort to minimise absenteeism, which has a cost implication to business. Treble argues that the CBI survey does not take this issue into account.

“It might be obvious to point out that personnel managers incur costs in trying to reduce worker absence, but the CBI survey does not take this aspect seriously,” he said.

“We believe that any estimate of the cost of absenteeism to industry must take into account how much it would have cost to have prevented the absences in the first place. Our estimates include the cost of prevention as well as the cost of lost production. It turns out that these two figures more or less cancel each other out, implying a net cost close to zero.”

Data suitable for implementing Treble’s technique is not available in the UK, so the team used economic data relating to the French workforce. The results show that absenteeism costs the French economy about £15.6m each year.

“I cannot imagine that French managers are much different from British managers in terms of how they manage absence,” said Treble.

“The net cost of absenteeism in Britain is, therefore, likely to be significantly lower than even the most conservative of the CBI’s estimates.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Treble said he hoped to conduct research using British data in the near future.

The abstract of the research has a link to the full report.

Mike Berry

previous post
Cornish hospital trust staff to vote to strike over job cuts and offshoring
next post
Ethical recruitment code to deter hiring social care workers from developing world

You may also like

RAD Awards 2026 open for entries

16 Jul 2025

Sick pay reforms ‘deliver £2bn of benefits’ –...

16 Jul 2025

Ethnicity and disability pay gaps: Ready to report?...

16 Jul 2025

Trans row nurse cleared of misconduct as tribunal...

16 Jul 2025

Hugh’s Law calls for paid leave for parents...

16 Jul 2025

Inflation increases by more than expected

16 Jul 2025

Beware the unintended consequences of the NDA ban

16 Jul 2025

Number of police working second jobs doubles

15 Jul 2025

Mansion House speech: will employers’ pension contributions rise?

15 Jul 2025

University staff to strike over hybrid working curbs

15 Jul 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+