Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Disability discriminationEquality, diversity and inclusionDisabilityLatest NewsNeurodiversity

Does measuring disability data really help us achieve workplace inclusion?

by Angela Matthews 22 Nov 2021
by Angela Matthews 22 Nov 2021 Relying on one overall figure to measure disability employment and pay gaps may be misleading
Shutterstock
Relying on one overall figure to measure disability employment and pay gaps may be misleading
Shutterstock

Campaigners are pushing for employers to close the disability employment gap at a quicker pace, but are organisations measuring the right thing, with the right intention? Angela Matthews argues for a more holistic approach. 

The government recently published figures on the disability employment gap. Campaigners often say that the gap has not moved far enough.

Business Disability Forum agrees but we also remain cautious about if we – employers and the government – are measuring the right thing, and in the right way.

With the government shortly due to publish its consultation on making disability workforce reporting mandatory for employers with over 250 employees, now is the time we need to consider, what we need to measure to achieve true workplace inclusion.

Behind the scenes

We know from our work with employers that an “impressive” percentage of disabled people in the workforce, beautifully structured and legally accurate policies, and emotive internal communications campaigns are not the measure of an inclusive workplace for disabled people.

I recently spoke to a disabled employee working in an organisation which had won awards and attracted media attention for disability inclusion.

Disability

Is it unlawful for an employer to ask on an application form whether an applicant has a disability? 

How to support an employee who becomes disabled

When I suggested to this employee that they had perhaps found an employer that truly values that everyone is different, they burst into tears and said I “could not be more wrong”. They then proceeded to share their personal workplace experiences with me.

This is not an isolated incident; I hear it often. We are surely missing the point if the experience of disabled employees and how they feel when they are at work does not match what we say and do in our workplace inclusion policies and communications.

Sharing information about a disability

What has this got to do with data monitoring? Everything. For years, employers have asked us how they get more people to tell them they have a disability.

Two things here. Firstly, employees are unlikely to tell their employer about their disability if they feel their employer will treat them differently.

An increasing mound of research shows that employees try not to share information about their disability until the really have to and that employees very much fear and dread sharing this information.

The culture of the whole organisation needs to feel an edifying one before anyone volunteers personal information about their lives.

Secondly, this being the most common question reflects something the government’s own statisticians have commented on in their recent reporting. It is likely that more people are now saying they have a disability when responding to surveys and that this is having a significant impact on the figures. This does not mean that more disabled people are getting into employment.

We have also long said that measuring ‘a’ gap is no true measure of equality, let alone inclusion. This is because just one figure puts a “non-severe” experience of a condition in the same group as someone with profound and complex disabilities.

We know some of the biggest barriers people experience are by type of adjustments and by type of condition or impairment.

A high figure that doesn’t include a wider representation of different types of people, disabilities, and ways of working is not equality, and it’s definitely not inclusion.

Measuring disability pay

We have similar concerns over measuring the disability pay gap. We need a more robust and effective methodology than that which gives us one overall figure.

The current methodology, which produces a single pay gap figure, does not give an accurate or useful picture to equip us to, firstly, identify the barriers to increasing earnings and, secondly, removing those barriers.

As an example, we know people with learning disabilities or long-term mental ill health are typically in lower paid jobs and working fewer hours than people with conditions related to neuroprocessing (or neurodiverse conditions) and some who have conditions affecting physical mobility.

We also know that many disabled people choose to be in part time work or non-managerial jobs because this is the most manageable employment option for them while managing complex conditions and medical treatments.

The current methodology, which produces a single pay gap figure, does not give an accurate or useful picture to equip us to, firstly, identify the barriers to increasing earnings and, secondly, removing those barriers.”

Therefore, the most inclusive thing an employer can do in such circumstances is offer downwards and sideways movements in the organisation or reduce someone’s hours (again, according to the employee’s wish to manage their conditions).

But this ultimately, of course, affects the figure we get for the disability pay gap. I spoke to a disabled woman working in finance.

Her employer had asked her to increase her hours and she had been repeatedly asked (“harassed” in her words) to apply for promotions, even though she did not want them.

This was all done in an attempt by the employer to achieve the figures set out in their inclusion strategy.

The woman felt that her employer’s figures were the outcomes, rather than her employer being supportive and understanding what is best for her managing her condition and being her best at work. This employer was regimented with its data reporting. But can we say this is inclusion?

Measuring inclusion

Workforce monitoring is important. But we need measurements that accurately tell us two things: who moves in and out of employment, and what their experience and opportunities are like when they are there.

This is hard, because it is far from where many employers and government data methodologies are at the moment.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

It is far easier to require one reported figure based on the same engrained methodologies and language that we have used for decades.

Changing it will be hard work. But it will also mean we are serious about inclusion. Now is the time to consider which option we really want to invest in.

D&I opportunities currently on PT Jobs


More D&I jobs
Angela Matthews

Angela Matthews is Head of Policy and Research at Business Disability Forum

previous post
Just one in three managers taking action on ethnic diversity
next post
Long Covid support needs to go beyond workplace adjustments

You may also like

Connect to Work: how businesses can play their...

2 May 2025

Eight new equality laws in the pipeline

10 Apr 2025

HR and businesses respond to Spring Statement

26 Mar 2025

HMRC worker sent birthday card awarded £25k for...

21 Mar 2025

Disability pay gap reporting could have unintended consequences

19 Mar 2025

What do welfare reforms mean for employers?

19 Mar 2025

One in 10 firms taken to tribunal because...

14 Mar 2025

Disabled workers disadvantaged by return-to-office mandates

13 Mar 2025

Eight in 10 disabled staff feel burnout as...

12 Mar 2025

Why Access to Work can be worth the...

18 Feb 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+