Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsGender pay gap

Up to 15% of gender pay gap reports have errors

by Ashleigh Webber 23 Apr 2019
by Ashleigh Webber 23 Apr 2019

Up to 1,600 organisations may have made mistakes in their gender pay gap calculations, with many calculating the median or pay quartiles incorrectly.

According to the Royal Statistical Society (RSS), as much as 15% of the 2018 gender pay gap reports published ahead of the April deadline could be incorrect.

Gender pay gap

How gender pay gap sums should be made more accurate

The 2018 gender pay gap: grounds for optimism?

It found that 572 employers had made mistakes in their reports, while it had suspicions about the accuracy of a further 1,000 submissions.

According to the research published in the Times, brewer Greene King’s report incorrectly claimed that the majority of staff in its higher income quartile were women, while Cleveland police used the wrong calculation for the median average.

Earlier this month the RSS claimed that many errors could be avoided if government guidance was improved and simpler calculation methods were adopted. It also suggested that pay data should be presented in pounds and pence, rather than percentages, to remove ambiguity.

The RSS said HR professionals should be better supported in their gender pay gap calculations, as they are effectively being asked to take on statistical tasks they might not have the skills to carry out.

Nigel Marriott, a fellow of the RSS, said: “People working in HR and payroll departments are largely left on their own to figure out the calculations, even though many of these staff will never have had statistics training.

“It doesn’t help that the government’s own guidance on its website is very ambiguous.”

He also told the Times that larger companies may have “overestimated” their own statistical abilities and would benefit from contracting an external statistician to calculate their gender pay gap accurately.

According to data analytics firm Paygaps.com, the most common error employers have made is failing to provide a link to a report on their website. It suggested that this, and other mistakes, could lead employees to believe that their employer “didn’t care enough” about the gender pay gap reporting requirement.

It has also been suggested that the use of manual calculation methods, such as spreadsheets, have resulted in erroneous data being submitted to the government portal.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission, which is responsible for enforcement of the gender pay gap legislation, said 5% of eligible private sector organisations had not submitted their data ahead of the 4 April deadline – roughly 440.

EHRC chief executive Rebecca Hilsenrath said: “Gender pay gap reporting is not optional. It is a legal requirement and there’s simply no excuse for employers failing to comply with the regulations this year. We will be taking enforcement action against all organisations that have not filed by the deadline requiring them to report immediately.

“Employers that don’t report on time not only risk enforcement action and potential financial penalties; they are letting down the women who work for them. They should be prepared for an unhappy workforce and potential reputational damage.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

She said it is vital that employers publish action plans to “explain their figures and highlight where they will be targeting any inequality in their workplace”.

 

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
‘Give women a fair chance to lead’ urge psychology experts
next post
Eight in 10 doctors at risk of ‘burnout’

You may also like

Ethnicity and disability pay gaps: Ready to report?...

1 Jul 2025

Parental leave system is ‘broken’, say MPs

10 Jun 2025

Period pain and absence harm women’s pay and...

13 May 2025

Tackling suspect gender pay gap data

30 Apr 2025

What will reward look like in 2035?

28 Apr 2025

Link between reduced gender pay gap and revenue...

4 Apr 2025

Have group litigation claims advanced pay equality?

26 Mar 2025

Sullivan Review shows how ‘sex’ has been purged...

20 Mar 2025

Ethnicity and disability pay gap reporting: Lessons from...

18 Mar 2025

Equality at work: ‘Men are out of touch’

28 Feb 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+