Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Case lawLatest NewsEmployment tribunalsPay & benefitsOvertime

Holland & Barrett employee wins overtime case for opening and closing up

by Ashleigh Webber 9 Apr 2019
by Ashleigh Webber 9 Apr 2019 Yui Mok/PA Archive/PA Images
Yui Mok/PA Archive/PA Images

Retailers whose staff work extra hours to open and close the store should ensure their employees are adequately remunerated for such duties after a tribunal ruled that health food chain Holland & Barrett made unlawful deductions from the pay of an employee who was required to carry out tasks beyond his contracted hours.

Mr Fitz was employed as a supervisor and was required to cover for the store manager if they were absent. This required opening the store in the morning and closing the store in the evening, among other tasks that needed to be completed during opening hours.

Unpaid overtime

Unpaid hours and presenteeism blight UK workforce

Workers did 2 billion hours of unpaid overtime last year

Closing the store involved four stages: closing the tills on the shop floor; reconciling the tills in the back office; closing the register and locking up the store, all of which Holland & Barrett told the tribunal took a few minutes.

However, Fitz claimed that he also had to undertake other additional tasks at the end of the day, such as cleaning, checking the fridge and freezer temperature, and performance and sales target calculations.

He claimed he had clocked up over two hundred hours in overtime after his contracted shifts were due to finish, for which he was not paid.

The retailer’s area sales manager told the tribunal that it is common practice across the retail sector for managers not to be paid for time spent closing a shop.

However, the tribunal found that as Fitz was employed on a fixed hours’ contract, it was implied that that he – and any other employee with fixed hours – would be paid for any overtime they carried out.

In her judgment, employment judge Mary Siddall says: “There is nothing in writing that makes it clear that when covering for the manager, the claimant would have to complete the shop closing procedure without pay and this is considered part of his normal duties which are compensated for in the hourly rate.

“In any event, it is clear that closure of the store took place at the end of the working day, and after the time the claimant’s shift was due to end.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Fitz also claimed that the company had made unlawful deductions from his wages by reducing his contracted hours. However, the tribunal found that Fitz had accepted the change in hours when he agreed to the new contract and continued working for the retailer.

Holland & Barrett was ordered to pay Fitz £1,019.75 in compensation for the overtime worked.

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
How to get ahead in the labour market race
next post
Why auto-enrolment should always be on HR’s to do list

You may also like

Early careers NHS staff increasingly unhappy at work

20 Feb 2025

British employees work nearly 216 extra hours annually

30 Jan 2025

Working when the clocks go back: how to...

25 Oct 2024

Avanti drivers agree to overtime deal

25 Mar 2024

TUC: £26bn worth of overtime went unpaid last...

23 Feb 2024

Australia to give workers ‘right to disconnect’

7 Feb 2024

Top 10 HR questions January 2024: Carer’s leave...

2 Feb 2024

Top 10 HR questions July 2023: Strikes and...

1 Aug 2023

DWP only just introduced overtime holiday pay mechanism,...

2 Jun 2023

Coronation time off: ‘Spare a thought’ for those...

3 May 2023

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+