Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Age discriminationBullying and harassmentEquality, diversity and inclusionLatest NewsDiscrimination

Discrimination case dismissed to avoid encouraging ‘culture of hyper-sensitivity’

by Ashleigh Webber 3 Aug 2021
by Ashleigh Webber 3 Aug 2021 Andy Paradise/Shutterstock
Andy Paradise/Shutterstock

A case in which a lawyer made dozens of discrimination and harassment complaints against a clinical research company has been dismissed by an employment tribunal because it did not want to encourage ‘a culture of hyper-sensitivity’.

Miss Sithirapathy, a former lawyer at PSI CRO UK, made 42 complaints against the company at the Reading employment tribunal, including unfair dismissal; wrongful dismissal; unauthorised deduction from wages; breach of contract; age discrimination; sex discrimination; victimisation; and harassment related to age, sex and sexual orientation.

In 2016, acting country manager Mr Schmidt offered the claimant a role at the company’s head office in Switzerland with a salary of 120,000 Swiss francs. He asked her how old she was and when she told him she was 27, he is alleged to have said “your age will prevent you from commanding a higher salary”.

Sithirapathy declined the job offer at that point for personal reasons. Schmidt is said to have asked what those personal reasons were and is alleged to have stated: “You are not married, you don’t have children and you do not have a boyfriend”. He is also said to have told the claimant an anecdote about the Swiss office’s “tolerance” of a lesbian employee.

Recent discrimination cases

Up to claimants to provide discrimination evidence, Supreme Court rules

Male directors win sex discrimination case following ad agency’s ’embarrassing’ gender pay gap

Salesperson asked ‘can I get you pregnant?’ wins sex discrimination claim

The claimant told the tribunal that she was shocked by the comments and did not know how Schmidt knew this personal information about her. Schmidt told the tribunal that he had been trying to explain that sexuality or other personal circumstances were not an issue for the company, and the tribunal accepted that although what he said was “clumsy”, it came with good intention.

In late 2016 she applied for a promotion to senior legal counsel level and was told by head of legal, Ms Ruf, that she was not ready for a promotion as she was not performing at the same level as the three people who held a senior legal counsel role. This was repeated at an appraisal in March 2017, in which she was told she was still young so should not expect a promotion yet. Sithirapathy complained that she had been discriminated against because of her age.

In May 2017 she was offered a new, non-legal, role with parent company PSI CRO AG in Switzerland, beginning in September of that year.

Her employment at the UK arm of PSI was terminated shortly before she took up her role in Switzerland. The tribunal was satisfied that this was not actioned in order to prevent her from having continuous service in her new role in Switzerland.

The claimant moved to Switzerland on 4 September 2017 but was dismissed in October 2017 due to a reorganisation of the team. She enquired about whether she could return to her legal counsel role in the UK but was told this was not possible as the job had already been filled.

After her dismissal from PSI CRO AG, the claimant brought a case in the Cantonal Court of Zug, Switzerland, which found the decision had not breached Swiss law.

The UK employment tribunal found that her complaints of wrongful and unfair dismissal could not succeed because she was not dismissed from the UK company – the contract came to an end by mutual agreement.

The complaints of sex, sexual orientation and age discrimination were also dismissed, along with claims of unlawful harassment and breach of contract.

Employment judge Emma Hawksworth said: “The comments [made by Mr Schmidt] were unfortunate and awkward. However, we bear in mind the importance of not encouraging a culture of hyper-sensitivity or of imposing legal liability to every unfortunate phrase.

“We have concluded that, in this case, taking into account the context of the discussion, these comments did not cross the line such that they amounted to unlawful harassment.”

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

The judge also found the claimant had not been treated unfavourably at her appraisal, “The same comments would have been made to someone who was at the same career stage as the claimant, whatever their age. Using the words ‘still young’ in this context was another way of saying that the claimant was at the beginning of her professional career and was not a detriment to the claimant.”

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
XpertHR acquires pay analysis provider Gapsquare
next post
Lib Dems call for furlough commission to avoid unemployment crisis

You may also like

EHRC defends interim update as ‘balance of clarity...

13 Jun 2025

HR is second ‘most sexist profession’ survey suggests

13 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

NDA ban vital to tackling misogyny in music...

4 Jun 2025

Liberty to challenge EHRC consultation in High Court

3 Jun 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

RCN warns Darlington NHS trust over single-sex spaces

16 May 2025

EHRC bows to pressure and extends gender consultation

15 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

‘Unacceptable to question integrity’ of Supreme Court judgment

2 May 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+