Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Auto-enrolmentEducation - further and higherRecruitment & retention

Improving HR in higher education

by John Charlton 22 Mar 2005
by John Charlton 22 Mar 2005


A major new report has found that university HR departments get high marks for the progress they’ve made at senior level, with many having a firm place at the top table. But John Charlton finds that they have much work to do to make themselves effective throughout their higher education (HE) institutions, as they fight a ‘highly resilient anti-management culture’


Mission Critical? Modernising HR Management in Higher Education, by William Archer, director of the International Graduate Insight Group and non-executive chairman of Global Taskforce, was based on interviews with HR and university heads at 44 UK universities.



These ranged from the long-established universities of Oxford, Cambridge and Glasgow, through the new universities of the 1960s, such as East Anglia and York, to ones based on former polytechnics including Westminster and Coventry.



Archer reports that the “modernisation of the HR function in higher education in recent years has been remarkable. In the space of a few years, in many universities, HR has shifted from administrative support to a valued strategic partner for the top team.



“Most HR heads are working closely with their institutional heads and most have passed the point of discussing whether HR has a place at the top table. Many are actively involved in shaping strategy rather than reacting to it.”



So far, so good then. But a key challenge for HE HR will be to drive this success through universities’ many managerial ranks. And this will prove a formidable challenge due, in part, to the unique nature of academic life.



For example, the report found that many managers in universities regarded HR as a remote function rather than part of their job. This is partly explained by the nature of academic life: staff focus on their subjects and research fields, success in which raises their profiles, status, and earning potential.



As one university HR director said: “The natural loyalty of academic staff is first to their field of research, second to a wider discipline and third to an institution – the institution that happens to employ them.”



And for academics, those they regard as colleagues are just as likely to be peers researching similar subjects around the world, as those they work with.



Subject loyalty is especially strong in research-led institutions, such as the older universities.



Such factors have given rise to a “highly resilient anti-management culture”, says the report, “even among managers.”



These characteristics have created “possibly the most challenging environment for anyone involved in HR management”, Archer says.



“Most academics did not enter higher education with the intention of managing people,” he adds. “And the indication from interviewees in the study is that many academics do not naturally prioritise HR management and HR issues in their work.



“Significant continued investment in management development appears to be the key.”



Nevertheless the report found heads of HR had changed their department’s primary function from central administrative silos to client-facing advisory services, and were driving a “new HR agenda” through the institution they served.



Key to this is aligning institutional goals with personal performance.



Archer found interviewees interpreted this issue in one of three ways: a few questioned the wisdom and feasibility of alignment in an academic context; others focused on managerial roles and how to empower or encourage managers to align or motivate their teams; and some saw the issue as how best to motivate individual staff.



A majority saw a need for their institutions to develop more effective appraisal and accountability systems. But a few said managing academic staff was more of an art than a process. Some admitted that appraisals for academic staff at their institutions were still optional.



Archer says effective appraisal processes linked to recognition and reward and effective two-way internal communication are key to aligning personal performance with institutional objectives.



Performance-related reward schemes operate in many universities but adoption is patchy. Some of the interviewees expressed strong resistance to any form of performance-related pay.



“What we don’t like is performance-related pay,” said one vice-chancellor. “One, they’re very high maintenance. Two, it is bloody hard to avoid favouritism and discrimination. Three, improved performance is not reflected in increased profit, so where does the money come from? And finally, it demoralises everyone who doesnÕt get it.”



But most of those interviewed favoured performance-related processes and believe that, at senior level, there was a “close and increasingly explicit connection between performance and reward”.



Yet, fewer than one in 10 of those interviewed claimed this worked effectively throughout their institutions.



Nevertheless, this is a nettle that universities must grasp if they want to prosper in what will be a tougher and more demanding business and academic climate.



UK universities operate more than ever in a worldwide market, where there is stiff competition for academic stars and high-quality, fee-paying students. An indication of this is the global rankings of universities, which are dominated by wealthy US institutions.



The report says that over the next 10 years, an extra 19,000 academics will be needed to replace current staff and another 17,000 will be needed if the government’s 50% student enrolment target is met.



Universities UK recently predicted that before 2012, some 230,000 new academic staff will need to be recruited in the US, Canada, the UK, Australia and New Zealand.



UK universities, to compete, must adopt recruitment processes driven by an understanding of what makes academic staff join, stay and quit.



Archer concludes: “Response management, selection and assessment processes generally lag behind the private sector. Given the drive towards e-enablement and pressure to reduce costs, these can be expected to receive further attention in the near future.”

Avatar
John Charlton

previous post
All through the night
next post
Broadcaster leads the way on employee consultation

You may also like

Economic outlook slows hiring despite skills shortfalls

5 Aug 2022

CIPD: Stop using degrees to screen candidates

3 Aug 2022

Could legacy tech be impacting workers’ health?

29 Jul 2022

NHS workforce faces ‘greatest crisis in history’

25 Jul 2022

Businesses missing out on ‘rebound’ employees

25 Jul 2022

Number of planned redundancies in UK falls by...

22 Jul 2022

Hire quality vs speed: Finding the perfect balance...

21 Jul 2022

Ministers signal ‘light touch’ regulation of AI in...

21 Jul 2022

Women over 50 hesitant to progress due to...

19 Jul 2022

Real wages fall 2.8% as pay fails to...

19 Jul 2022
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+