Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Collective bargainingLatest NewsEmployee relationsCase lawTrade unions

Kostal v Dunkley: How bypassing collective bargaining can cost employers dearly

by Richard Arthur 10 Nov 2021
by Richard Arthur 10 Nov 2021 The UK Supreme Court delivered its verdict in Kostal v Dunkley last month. Photo: Russell Hart / Alamy
The UK Supreme Court delivered its verdict in Kostal v Dunkley last month. Photo: Russell Hart / Alamy

Last month, the Supreme Court delivered a ground-breaking ruling in the case of Kostal v Dunkley and others. Richard Arthur examines the judgment and finds it has far-reaching implications for every unionised workplace in the UK.

In the 2015/16 pay round, automotive components manufacturer, Kostal UK, made an offer to the Unite union which included pay and a Christmas bonus and which was then rejected by Unite members in a ballot.

The company then attempted to bypass the union bargaining procedure by making the offer direct to employees, giving a deadline for acceptance if the bonus was to be paid. The great majority of employees accepted. Similar further offers were then made to those who had not accepted. A collective agreement was reached with Unite later in 2016.

However, 57 Unite members brought employment tribunal claims that “unlawful inducements” had been made for them to give up collective bargaining rights.

Section 145B Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 provides union members with the right not to have offers made to them if acceptance would have the “prohibited result”. The prohibited result is that one or more of their terms and conditions will not, or will no longer, be determined by collective bargaining. But the offers are only unlawful if the employer’s purpose in making them is to achieve the prohibited result.

If the tribunal upholds such a claim, it must award a prescribed amount of compensation (currently £4,341) to each claimant, for each offer made to them.

Collective bargaining

How to negotiate terms and conditions with a trade union

Union wins unlawful inducements case at Supreme Court

In Dunkley and others v Kostal, the employment tribunal upheld the claims. It found that making the offers had “destroyed” the union’s mandate and bypassed the agreed collective bargaining procedures.  The tribunal awarded compensation in excess of £420,000, representing the prescribed award (then £3,800) for each offer of the two offers made to employees.

That decision was upheld by the Employment Appeal Tribunal, but then overturned by the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal ruled that the prohibited result only arose where the terms were taken outside the scope of collective bargaining permanently.

The five Justices of the Supreme Court unanimously upheld Unite’s appeal on 27 October 2021. The court ruled that an employer must not make offers which, if accepted, would cause bargaining arrangements to be bypassed. This would be the case where, if the offers had not been made, there was a ‘real possibility’ that the term(s) would be determined by collective bargaining.

The Court therefore ruled that employers must complete and exhaust union bargaining procedures before they make offers directly to the workforce. An employer cannot be allowed to ignore agreed union bargaining procedures, either by refusing to follow the procedure, or by being free to “drop in and out of the collective process as and when it suits its purpose”.

Where an employer genuinely believes that the collective bargaining process has been completed and exhausted, then its purpose will not be to achieve the prohibited result. However, it is implicit in the ruling that the collective bargaining must be conducted in good faith.

It is important to appreciate the types of offer, which will be unlawful if made before the bargaining procedures have been completed in good faith. They include offers to agree to give up a right to have terms and conditions determined by collective bargaining permanently. They also include offers to agree to give up a right to have terms determined by collective bargaining in an individual pay round. But, very significantly, they also include offers which, if accepted, would mean that one or more terms will not be determined by collective bargaining in that particular pay round.

An employer that makes such offers before completing and exhausting the agreed bargaining procedures in good faith will be liable to pay the prescribed amount of £4,341 for each offer made to each employee.

This is the first time the UK’s highest court has had to consider trade union collective bargaining rights. Section 145B was introduced following the decision of the European Court of Human Rights in the Wilson v Palmer case in 2002, and followed government consultations which indicated that section 145B was also intended to cover ‘comparable situations’. The Supreme Court therefore had to give effect to rights derived from Article 11 of the European Convention in a UK labour law setting which is hostile to trade unions.

The Supreme Court’s ruling breaks new ground for the extension and protection of trade union collective bargaining rights in the UK.

In European Convention terms, this protection is rooted in trade union membership – the right for everyone to join a trade union ‘for the protection of their interests’. It has long been the case that trade union collective bargaining means better pay and terms and conditions, and safer workplaces. Trade union membership continues to rise as we emerge from the pandemic. The Supreme Court’s ruling shows exactly why membership of a trade union is so important.

Employee relations opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more Employee Relations jobs

Richard Arthur
Richard Arthur

Richard Arthur, head of trade union law at Thompsons Solicitors, which represented Unite in the case of Kostal UK v Dunkley.

previous post
Going to bed between 10pm-11pm optimal for heart health, study suggests
next post
Tesco worker who was shut in room awarded £50,000

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

RPI inflation forecast to reach 18% says think...

3 Aug 2022

Train drivers will strike on Saturday 30 July

14 Jul 2022

RMT union rejects Network Rail pay offer –...

13 Jul 2022

Heathrow-based cabin crew set for 18% pay rise

28 Jun 2022

Bolt drivers strike as union launches workers’ rights...

15 Jun 2022

Deliveroo signs deal with union GMB to cover...

12 May 2022

Bank of England chief warns workers not to...

4 Feb 2022

Inflation hits 30-year high

19 Jan 2022

Making the world of work better: TUC’s Paul...

14 Jan 2022

Report: Prioritise workers’ pensions, not shareholder returns

10 Jan 2022
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+