Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Collective bargainingLatest NewsTrade unionsPay settlementsEmployment contracts

Collective bargaining: Union wins ‘unlawful inducements’ case at Supreme Court

by Rob Moss 27 Oct 2021
by Rob Moss 27 Oct 2021 Ian Bottle / Alamy
Ian Bottle / Alamy

Unite has won a case at the Supreme Court on whether an employer can offer inducements to staff that ‘bypass’ a decision reached through a ballot, in what has been described as a “paradigm shift” in industrial relations.

In Kostal UK v Dunkley and others, the Supreme Court found in favour of a group of Unite members whose employer, Kostal, a car components manufacturer in Rotherham, had sought to undermine union negotiations by offering unlawful inducements to subvert a union ballot that had rejected a pay offer.

However, the Supreme Court has maintained that employers can make direct offers to employees if the collective bargaining process has been exhausted, making it clearer when direct engagement is permitted for employers changing terms and conditions.

Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: “With the support of their union the workers stood firm. Now they have won an historic case that creates a legal precedent for every union member across the UK.

“It means that employers cannot subvert or bypass union collective bargaining processes by offering their workforces inducements of one type of another to abandon union mandates. That is momentous.”

In October 2015, Kostal and Unite began formal pay negotiations. After two meetings with Unite representatives, Kostal made a pay offer, which was rejected after the union balloted its members.

Collective bargaining

The consequences of trade union recognition

How to negotiate terms and conditions with a trade union

In the December, Kostal made the same pay offer directly to its employees, bypassing Unite, urging them to accept the offer individually or lose a Christmas bonus worth £270.

Then, in January 2016 Kostal made a similar offer to employees that had not accepted the first offer. It said that, if no agreement was reached, “this may lead to the company serving notice on your contract of employment”.

By November 2016 more than 97% of employees had accepted one of the two direct offers, and Kostal and Unite reached a collective agreement on similar terms to the direct offers. However, before that point, Mr Dunkley and other claimants complained to an employment tribunal that the direct offers made to them by Kostal contravened section 145b of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992.

Unite won two employment tribunals which ruled that both Kostal offers amounted to “unlawful inducements” and its members were awarded more than £420,000 in compensation.

Kostal appealed to the Employment Appeal Tribunal which dismissed the case. Kostal then went to the Court of Appeal, which unanimously found in Kostal’s favour. Setting aside the previous decisions, it agreed that the tribunal’s interpretation of Section 145b of the Act gave unions a “an effective veto over any direct offer to any employee concerning any term of the contract, major or minor, on any occasion”.

This judgment is a game changer. It means that employers cannot ignore legally established collective bargaining rights just because they suddenly choose to ignore them or subvert them” – Sharon Graham, Unite

Lawyers acting for Kostal have previously described the original tribunal decision as “a paradigm shift in industrial relations”.

Of today’s Supreme Court judgment, Graham said: “This judgment is a game changer. It means that employers cannot ignore legally established collective bargaining rights just because they suddenly choose to ignore them or subvert them.”

The Supreme Court unanimously allowed the appeal and restored the awards made by the employment tribunals, meaning the workers involved will each receive a compensation payment of around £8,000.

The judgment confirmed that Kostal’s direct offers to Unite members breached section 145b of the Act. Lord Leggatt, with whom Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin agreed, provided the lead judgment. However, Lady Arden and Lord Burrows gave a joint judgment that resulted in the same outcome but advanced a different interpretation of sections 145b and d.

Angela Brumpton, partner at law firm gunnercooke, which represented Kostal, said: “Naturally we are deeply disappointed for our client, Kostal UK Ltd. However employers in general will no doubt be content with the Supreme Court decision, which removes a considerable degree of risk where collective bargaining has been exhausted.”

Unite national officer Simon Coop, who was involved in the original dispute, said: “Justice has been done at last. It is actually a vindication of Unite’s reps system, which ensured all the union members stuck together through thick and thin.”

Jonathan Tuck, partner at law firm Baker McKenzie, said “The Court ruled that Kostal’s pay offer directly to employees was an unlawful inducement because the collective bargaining process had not been exhausted.”

“However, although Kostal lost on the facts, the majority of the Supreme Court rejected the claimant’s broader arguments on collective bargaining which would have significantly changed the industrial relations landscape in the UK.”

“The decision confirms that employers can legitimately make direct offers to employees so long as they first exhaust their collective bargaining processes, and provides useful clarity on when they can engage directly with the workforce on changing terms and conditions. It underlines the importance of following the agreed process, but confirms that ultimately, trade unions cannot veto changes to terms and conditions when negotiations have failed.”

Richard Arthur, head of trade union law at Thompsons Solicitors, which represented Unite, said: “This is the most important trade union rights case in over a decade – and the first case in the UK’s highest court on trade union bargaining rights.  It protects the fundamental right of workers to meaningful collective bargaining and has widespread implications for every unionised workplace.”

Personnel Today approached Kostal for comment.

Employee relations opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more Employee Relations jobs

Rob Moss
Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. He specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts, most recently on the challenges created by the coronavirus pandemic. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and electrical markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
Proportion in low-paid jobs lowest on record
next post
Budget 2021: Pay rises, scale up visa and universal credit reforms announced

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Deliveroo signs deal with union GMB to cover...

12 May 2022

Bank of England chief warns workers not to...

4 Feb 2022

Inflation hits 30-year high

19 Jan 2022

Making the world of work better: TUC’s Paul...

14 Jan 2022

Report: Prioritise workers’ pensions, not shareholder returns

10 Jan 2022

The 10 most important employment law cases in...

8 Dec 2021

Kostal v Dunkley: How bypassing collective bargaining can...

10 Nov 2021

Unite announces election of first female leader

25 Aug 2021

‘Four-day week’ trials transform Icelandic employment

6 Jul 2021

Deliveroo drivers remain self-employed, appeal court rules

25 Jun 2021
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+