Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionPositive actionRecruitment & retentionSelection interviews

Legal Q&A: Positive action under the Equality Act 2010

by Emma Bartlett 3 Feb 2011
by Emma Bartlett 3 Feb 2011

Q What is positive action?

Positive action is one of the Government’s range of measures aimed at ending discrimination in the workplace under the Equality Act 2010. It can be used in two areas: “encouragement and training” (since October 2010) and “recruitment and promotion” (from April 2011).

In recruitment and promotion, it allows an employer, when faced with two or more candidates of equal merit, to select a candidate from a particular group (eg a particular racial group, age group or gender) that faces a disadvantage or is under-represented in its workforce over a candidate who isn’t from that group, to achieve diversity in its workforce.

Q Why is positive action necessary?

The concept of positive action was considered necessary, because some discrimination is so entrenched that merely prohibiting it is insufficient.

Positive action is just one of a range of measures an employer can adopt to address disproportionate representation amongst its workforce. Other measures might include reviewing recruitment or training practices to ascertain whether or not any criteria are being used that might be discriminatory and should be removed, or consulting with employee groups or a trade union about the needs of a workplace minority and how to increase representation. A positive action programme can be layered on top of these measures with guaranteed interview schemes for particular groups.

Q How does an employer identify if it needs to take positive action?

An employer that reasonably thinks that there is a need to increase diversity in its organisation should first obtain credible evidence to determine whether or not employees who share a particular protected characteristic are under-represented. For example, the employer could compare the proportion of its workforce that is of a minority group with national or local statistics. A company in London with only two black employees out of a workforce of 200 is likely to have more significant diversity issues to address than a company in Cornwall with the same statistics, because of the different make-up of the local populations.

Q How can positive action be taken in relation to “recruitment and promotion”?

Proposals for positive action in relation to recruitment and promotion received controversial media reports (for example: “white men face jobs ban”). The media were concerned that it would be used to recruit or promote someone less qualified than another, because they had a particular protected characteristic. This is incorrect.

As a matter of good practice employers may wish to take positive action measures to increase participation in their workforce from certain groups sharing a protected characteristic. If an employer considers that people with a certain protected characteristic are under-represented in its workforce, positive action allows it to address this by recruiting or promoting a candidate who has that characteristic, eg promoting a black candidate over a white one into a role where the employees are predominantly white.

However, the employer can only evoke “positive action” if it is faced with two candidates who are “as qualified as” each other. The principal of selection on merit remains key to recruitment or promotion decisions.

Q Who determines whether or not two candidates are “as qualified as” each other?

Positive action is exercised at the employer’s discretion. Determining whether or not candidates are “as qualified as” each other will be difficult if the relevant recruitment (or promotion) factors are mainly subjective. Few positions will be solely determined on objective criteria such as relevant qualifications; employers generally give greater weight to a candidate’s experience or other subjective qualities. Guidance on positive action published by the Government Equalities Office supports a wider interpretation of the phrase “as qualified as” because it says that candidates must be of “equal merit”, taking into account their overall ability, competence, professional experience and “any other qualities” required for the job.

Q What is best practice advice?

Clear and considered communication is important to avoid unlawful discrimination. Positive action should complement other diversity measures that employers adopt. If used in relation to recruitment or promotion, an employer will need to objectively justify any decision taken and possibly give feedback to an unsuccessful candidate. It is a useful measure, but one to be used with training since the reason for the final appointment may need to be transparent.

Emma Bartlett is a partner in the employment team at Speechly Bircham LLP

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Further information

  • Equality Act 2010: Government implements positive action provisions

XpertHR FAQs on positive action and the Equality Act

  • How will the positive action provisions in the Equality Act 2010 that relate to recruitment and promotion work?
  • Are employers obliged to take positive action towards under-represented groups under the Equality Act 2010?
  • What “positive action” is permitted under discrimination legislation?
  • Are all the provisions in the Equality Act 2010 in force from October 2010?

Emma Bartlett

previous post
Data analysis improves clinical audit process
next post
London HR Performance conference – details revealed

1 comment

Positive for you, negative for me | National Police Autism Association 29 Jul 2018 - 1:50 pm

[…] people with different needs, or who are disadvantaged in some way, access work or training.” PA is established in law – the Equality Act 2010, to be exact – and is linked to protected characteristics, also […]

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Company director wins £15k after being told to...

4 Jul 2025

How can HR prepare for changes to the...

3 Jul 2025

Government publishes ‘roadmap’ for Employment Rights Bill

2 Jul 2025

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Employers’ duty of care: keeping workers safe in...

27 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

When will the Employment Rights Bill become law?

26 Jun 2025

Graduate jobs this summer ‘will be toughest since...

25 Jun 2025

Employers struggling with soaring candidate deception

25 Jun 2025

UK engineering and manufacturing firms face hiring struggles

23 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+