Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Employee relationsEmployee communicationsHR strategyThe HR professionOpinion

Losing sight of human resources development will cost us our place on the board

by Personnel Today 8 Oct 2007
by Personnel Today 8 Oct 2007

What has happened to human resources (HR) development? From our experience with our MSc for senior practitioners, it seems to have suffered the same fate as the promised shoes for the cobbler’s children.

Nine months ago, we were lauded by many – including the Financial Times – when we launched a product aimed at supporting the translation of HR experts into business HR experts. This, the FT identified, was one of the great differentiators that positioned some HR functions on business boards and left other functions behind. Our friends at Personnel Today felt that this was such a significant need in their senior readership that they ran a bursary competition for one reader to study for the new qualification (see picture) – yet we can’t run the programme due to insufficient numbers.

As someone with a consumer background, my first question was: what’s wrong with the product? It offered credit for professional qualification, an action learning rather than a classroom approach to development – both business and functional – and a strategic project with clear business deliverables that would add value to a sponsoring organisation. Priced at the same level as similar senior products in other areas which sell well, it was positioned as an opportunity to work collaboratively with other peers alongside the Henley team. If you measure this product against what HR professionals say they want, then it met the requirements, delivered by a business school ranked by the Economist Intelligence Unit as being among the world’s top 10 MBA schools.

So is there a deeper issue that senior HR professionals are facing? At board level, the key deliverable is business (or in public/third sectors, operational) understanding the output being a functional agenda aligned to and supportive of the wider organisational goals. I have always argued that, in the most effective HR functions, the senior professionals have got there through using the experience gained from such things as postings outside of the function, completing MBAs and attending general management programmes at top business schools. This experience takes time to acquire, requires investment, and involves taking professional risks.

In talking with people across the function about this situation, I find that there are some very mixed messages out there. This type of development is appealing, a formal qualification from a top school is valued, a strategic project where value is given back immediately is seen as a core requirement, and the ability to work with a peer group from across a wide range of sectors is very attractive. But, when it comes down to it, it seems many HR professionals are unwilling to commit to the time involved to get the experience needed, or their organisations don’t see the value. This is really disappointing: regardless of whether there is a qualification involved or not, senior management development in any function takes time.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Experienced HR practitioners are exceptionally good at identifying internal talent which can then be developed and grown into the leaders of the future. They are great at spotting and championing solutions for others, yet seem unable or unwilling to embrace such solutions for themselves. Masters in consulting, coaching and the rest thrive at this level – but these are for many ‘exit’ qualifications from practising HR into becoming consultants in HR and HR-related issues. There is a plethora of qualification programmes out there – but most are for those who are new or nearly new to the function.

So, how much do we value the intensity of personal and professional development that comes from signing up for a substantial longer-term and more time-intensive learning experience? In the age of these networking conferences where we get the answer to the big questions in a day, it is tempting to reject more traditional methods. Yet substance comes from reflection, interaction, challenge and time spent connecting new knowledge and insights to current problems – and it is substance that will put us on the board.

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Weekly dilemma – Harassment
next post
Have a rant – Cross-fertilisation in human resources

You may also like

Richard Tice: ‘pathetic’ to put HR manager in...

26 Jun 2025

Movers and shakers in HR: Asda, BBC, FSB,...

26 Jun 2025

Fear of confrontation means disputes escalate – research

25 Jun 2025

HR underprepared for likely increase in M&A activity

24 Jun 2025

With HR absence rising, is your people team...

24 Jun 2025

Seven ways to prepare now for the Employment...

20 Jun 2025

HR and employment leaders feature in King’s birthday...

16 Jun 2025

The employer strikes back: the rise of ‘quiet...

13 Jun 2025

Data ‘blind spots’ blighting employee relations

13 Jun 2025

Workplace disputes: ‘Most employment tribunals could be avoided’

12 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+