Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Economics, government & businessBusiness performanceOpinion

Public sector is haunted by poor productivity tag

by Personnel Today 26 Apr 2005
by Personnel Today 26 Apr 2005

Value for taxpayers’ money spent on public services has been a recurring theme in the general election campaign, with the government accused of boosting public sector payrolls without securing a commensurate improvement in public service performance, which implies a fall in productivity. But is such criticism justified?

It is certainly true that the number of people employed in the public sector has risen relatively strongly in recent years -up by 583,000 (11%) between 1998 and the start of 2004 (the latest quarter for which official figures are currently available).

During the same period, private sector employment grew by 4%. Critics say that too many of these new staff are ‘unproductive bureaucrats’, hence the fall in productivity.

However, this claim is exaggerated. A balanced assessment suggests that managers and administrators account for only around one in four of the net increase in public sector jobs since 1998. Frontline professionals account for a similar proportion with the remaining half best described as ‘intermediate staff’, teaching assistants, nursing auxiliaries, care support workers, and so on.

This implies that poor public sector productivity is explained primarily by deficiencies in organisation and management practice rather than ‘too many bureaucrats’ per se. But it is also likely that public sector performance itself is being underestimated.

Public service outputs – for example, the number of hospital treatments in a given year or the number of school pupils passing exams – may not adequately reflect improvement in public service outcomes, such as the impacts on health in society or employability, which are ultimately what matter.

Likewise, output measures might not always identify improvement in the quality of outputs.

And in practical terms for the period since the late 1990s, it may be that the apparent fall in productivity is due to a lag between higher public spending and increased outputs if higher spending has been needed to build public sector capacity.

To investigate these issues, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) launched a review of public sector output and quality figures – headed by eminent economist Sir Tony Atkinson – which published its final report earlier this year.

Atkinson’s central recommendation was for a measurement procedure called ‘triangulation’.

This boils down to supplementing output and input data, with an array of independent evidence, assessment and evaluation to form a triangular performance scorecard.

The ONS is already starting to apply this procedure in the way it measures health and education outputs and will in due course establish a UK centre for the measurement of government activity.

This seems a sensible way forward, although the mix of quantitative and qualitative metrics involved in triangulation will doubtless leave ample scope for future disputes about how productive the public sector really is.

John Philpott is chief economist, Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development



Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Banker fails to make former employer pay up for legal costs
next post
Pro-US stunt brings a tear to the eye

You may also like

Inflation in May 2022 at 40-year high, as...

22 Jun 2022

Workforce wellbeing and job design: Stephen Bevan talks...

17 Jun 2022

Setback for civil servants’ union in bid to...

10 Jun 2022

The outdated views of the anti-hybrid working brigade

9 Jun 2022

Future of work under Labour: Justin Madders talks...

9 Jun 2022

Corporate reporting and audit regime will reduce risk...

31 May 2022

Davos 2022: ‘Invest in social jobs to save...

27 May 2022

Parliament launches UK labour market inquiry

27 May 2022

Davos hears that ‘wages can rise’ without creating...

26 May 2022

How to respond to an HMRC furlough enquiry

18 May 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+