Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Asylum seekersEmployment lawHR practiceMigrant workersRecruitment & retention

The immigrant worker game – red tape is a real turn-off

by Personnel Today 1 Mar 2009
by Personnel Today 1 Mar 2009

Significant changes have been taking place to our immigration system, in particular with regard to the employment of foreign workers. From 27 November 2008, organisations wanting to employ people from outside the European Economic Area must successfully apply for a sponsorship licence from the Border and Immigration Agency (BIA), which can cost as much as £1,000.

The new points-based immigration system has been the subject of much criticism. Not only must employers prove they are worthy of a sponsorship licence, they must also ensure they only issue certificates to employees who satisfy the criteria. Employers must take significant responsibility for the actions of their migrant employees, and the monitoring of illegal working, as well as close scrutiny of their HR processes and the general running of their businesses.

Although the register has been open for months, at the end of October 2008 only 3,700 employers had successfully registered as sponsors, significantly fewer than the 20,000 companies that had been expected to apply. The reasons for this seem to be the arduous process of filling in the online application, putting together vast amounts of accompanying documentation (which must be issued within 10 working days of the online application being made) and the fear of BIA spot checks of their HR systems.

The 130-page guidance document is by no means simple. It clearly indicates that the BIA has considerable discretion in granting and withdrawing sponsorship licences. Licences will only be granted to “genuine organisations that are likely to comply with their duties”. The BIA will also consider whether the organisation in question is “dependable and reliable,” “a genuine organisation operating lawfully” and “capable of carrying out its duties as a sponsor”.

These are highly subjective criteria, making it difficult to predict whether an organisation will be accepted as a sponsor. If there are any doubts as to the above issues, the BIA can label the employer as a B-rated sponsor, which leads to even higher levels of scrutiny and an action plan that must be completed within 12 months. Failing this, they will be struck off the sponsorship register.

If employers did not have their licence by 27 November, they cannot employ workers needing permits. Fast tracking is not possible and it can take six weeks for applications to be considered. Although there are other ways of migrant workers entering the UK, employers will find themselves forced to take domestic workers, who may be less able to do the job, simply because employers do not want the responsibility of becoming a sponsor.

This, along with the increase in civil sanctions in February this year, leaves employers feeling vulnerable to prosecution for inadvertent breaches under the new civil penalty scheme, leading to fines of up to £10,000 if an employer has not fully satisfied themselves, from documentation, that the employee is who they say they are.

Helen Duffy, solicitor, SA Law




Avatar
Personnel Today

previous post
Friday Podcast: JobCentre ads for skilled vacancies, CEO potential should do an HR stint, and air traffic ageism
next post
Ockey elf: All’s well that ends well for OH

You may also like

NHS should upskill admin staff to reduce waiting...

23 May 2022

City firms pledge to improve social mobility in...

20 May 2022

Steep rise in visas for non-EU migrant workers

19 May 2022

One in five employers planning ‘no jab no...

19 May 2022

Nurses leaving due to pressure and workplace culture

18 May 2022

Number of working people with disability up 1.3...

17 May 2022

Wages fall 1.2% behind inflation as cost of...

17 May 2022

Lack of flexibility pushes half of women to...

16 May 2022

How firms need to comply with sponsor licence...

16 May 2022

EasyJet joins battle for cabin crew with £1,000...

16 May 2022
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+