Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Recruitment & retentionPre-employment screening

To err is human: Are jobseeker ‘untruths’ in CVs really that much of a problem?

by Ross Bentley 24 Oct 2006
by Ross Bentley 24 Oct 2006

In the age of spin, it is accepted that jobseekers will use a CV to accentuate their positives but, according to research, a growing number of people are massaging the truth beyond what is generally deemed acceptable.

Employee screening company The Risk Advisory Group (TRAG) took a sample of 3,700 CVs submitted for job applications over the past year and found while more than half contained at least one inaccuracy, one in five contained significant lies.

These major fibs include discrepancies in employment and academic dates, the non-declaration of County Court Judgments and previous directorships and the inclusion of inaccurate academic qualifications.

Head of employee screening at TRAG, Sal Remtulla, said increased competition for jobs was driving candidates to such lengths in an attempt to set themselves apart from their peers.

She said: “There is also a sense that today everyone expects everyone else to lie on their CV, so why not join them.”

In response, Remtulla claims a growing number of employers, too busy to follow-up on references and other background details are turning to the services offered by TRAG and similar companies.

An indication of this trend was given in May when leading credit-checking company Experian acquired Backgroundchecking.com, an organisation specialising in candidate background checking for job applicants and contractors. 

“There’s certainly growth in this marketplace,” says Nick Harness, sales director at backgroundchecking.com.

According to Harness, the upturn in the need to check the details of a CV has come from an increase in regulatory pressure to ensure people are who they say they are.

Employers in the financial services industry, the security sector and sectors where work with vulnerable people is commonplace all now have an increased onus to check that candidates’ credentials stand up.

In fact, a study by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) last year found 77% of companies now follow-up references, with about a quarter (24%) claiming job offers had been withdrawn because people had misrepresented themselves on their CV.

CIPD adviser Rebecca Clake suggests there are a number of simple things employers can do to make their lives easier in this area. A straightforward starting point is to ask candidates to bring their qualification certificates to interview.

Clake also advises against allowing a candidate to start work until references have been checked.

“Many companies hard-pressed to fill a vacancy will start someone in a role before they have checked their references. Once that person has started work, it is much more difficult to get them out if you uncover anything suspect,” she said.

At the Recruitment and Employment Confederation, the trade association for recruitment agencies, chief executive Marcia Roberts also sends a warning note to candidates who exaggerate previous wages in the hope they can boost their pay packet in their new job.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“People feel they can inflate their salary on a CV and get away with it,” she said.

“But more companies are asking to see at least a pay slip and if a candidate has lied it could lead to instant dismissal. It is just not worth it.”

Ross Bentley

previous post
The good, the bad and the great: Personnel Today’s 360-Degree Appraisal of HR
next post
This week’s global HR news in brief

You may also like

RAD Awards 2026 open for entries

16 Jul 2025

Employees voting with feet as return-to-office pressure increases...

15 Jul 2025

Businesses warned against reducing recruitment in favour of...

15 Jul 2025

Food sector warned it is facing a workforce...

14 Jul 2025

Steep reduction in recruitment in June

14 Jul 2025

Engineers prioritising benefits over pay

14 Jul 2025

It’s no secret – parity in the workplace...

10 Jul 2025

Teacher recruitment goals ‘lack coherent plan’

9 Jul 2025

One in seven ‘revenge quit’ in latest employee...

7 Jul 2025

Graduate jobs this summer ‘will be toughest since...

25 Jun 2025

  • Empower and engage for the future: A revolution in talent development (webinar) WEBINAR | As organisations strive...Read more
  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+