Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Agency workersEmployment lawHR practiceEmployment tribunalsRecruitment & retention

Tribunal provides guidance on agency workers and Swedish derogation

by Stephen Simpson 30 Jan 2013
by Stephen Simpson 30 Jan 2013

An employment tribunal has provided guidance on the use of the “Swedish derogation” model, under which agency workers can sign a type of employment contract with their agency that means they give up the right to pay parity with direct recruits – to which they would normally be entitled after 12 weeks in an assignment – in return for some guaranteed pay between assignments.

The case involved an agency that has a long-term arrangement to provide BP with tanker drivers. When the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 came into force, BP was concerned that direct recruits’ unions would demand a parallel pay rise if agency drivers were given equal pay. BP required its agencies to switch their agency workers to the Swedish derogation model.

A group of the agency’s tanker drivers reluctantly signed the new agreements, which appeared to comply with the complex requirements set out in the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 for this exception to apply. These include that:

  • the contract of employment must contain a statement that the agency worker gives up the right under the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 to the same employment conditions as direct recruits insofar as they relate to pay; and
  • the agency must take reasonable steps to obtain suitable employment for the agency worker and pay him or her for at least four calendar weeks between assignments before it can terminate the contract.

The tanker drivers challenged the validity of the agreements, in a bid to claim equal pay with BP’s directly recruited tanker drivers. The employment tribunal went through the detailed provisions of the Swedish derogation and considered whether or not the agreements exempted the agency from paying the agency drivers the same as BP’s drivers.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Stephen Simpson, senior employment law editor at XpertHR, summarised the importance of the tribunal’s ruling: “This case confirms for now that the Swedish derogation is a valid model under which agencies can take on agency workers or, indeed, employers can ask agencies to operate. However, as an exception to agency workers’ normal rights, the requirements in the Agency Workers Regulations 2010 must be followed to the letter.”

Visit XpertHR for full coverage of the tribunal ruling on agency workers rights and the Swedish derogation.

Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Seven ways HR can use organisational risk to influence strategy
next post
NHS faces increasing costs caused by rising obesity

You may also like

Café worker awarded £22k after being too cold...

26 Aug 2025

Royal Mail eCourier drivers bring legal claim over...

26 Aug 2025

Jobs market continued to struggle during July

26 Aug 2025

Exec hauled over coals for sleeping in sauna...

22 Aug 2025

Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

22 Aug 2025

X settles severance claims of former Twitter employees

22 Aug 2025

Nature charity unfairly dismisses employee in ‘woeful’ process

22 Aug 2025

Security manager at BBC unfairly dismissed after ‘misusing’...

21 Aug 2025

Reasonable adjustment failures for epilepsy lead to £445k...

21 Aug 2025

Midwife files belief claim after Trust reported social...

20 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise