Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

StressWellbeing

Will stress standards make any difference?

by Michael Millar 9 Nov 2004
by Michael Millar 9 Nov 2004

The Health & Safety Executive (HSE) has launched management standards to help employers tackle workplace stress, but since they are not legally binding, there are claims they won’t make any difference.
At more than 13 million working days a year and an estimated cost of 3.7bn a year, work-related stress is the biggest occupational cause of working days lost through injury or ill-health.

The HSE has developed a continuous improvement model to try to tackle the problem, which features a benchmarking tool to help managers gauge stress levels, compare themselves with other organisations and work with employees to identify solutions.

However, unions claim that because the standards are voluntary, they will be ignored by employers.
Mick Reed, health and safety officer at Amicus, said the Government was “running shy” of legislation in the area of health and safety.

“Unless things are backed up by legislation, nothing happens,” he said. “The first thing the employer does is turn round and say: ‘We don’t have to do this – these are just guidelines, this is just voluntary’.”

Jane Kennedy, minister of state at the Department for Work and Pensions, said the Government would not make the system mandatory because symptoms of stress exhibited in the workplace do not necessarily all originate there, as staff bring “all sorts of pressures with [them] into work”.

Paul Coppin, stress claims expert at law firm Eversheds, has warned employers that despite the voluntary nature of the standards, ignoring them could leave businesses in hot water.

“Technically, these new management standards are only guidelines and do not have the power of legislation,” he said. “However, in reality, they will become the benchmark against which employers are judged.”

Mandatory or not, Robert Pascall, HR director at the West Dorset General Hospitals NHS Trust, said the standards offered HR a critical role in developing relationships with staff, unions, representative bodies and the HSE. “HR has got the opportunity to take something like these standards and work with them to make a major improvement on the organisation’s performance,” he said.

GO TO www.personneltoday.com/indepth

Stress: the figures

– 3.7bn – the cost of work-related stress to society

– 13.4 million – the number of working days lost to stress, depression and anxiety in 2001/2

– 29 – the average number of working days lost in each work-related stress case

– 500,000 – the number of people presently experiencing work-related stress at a level they believe has made them ill.

Source: the Health & Safety Executive

Stress: employers’ legal obligations

Employers have a duty to ensure, as far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of their employees at work (Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974) and to assess for health and safety risks (Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1999). These duties cover work-related stress.

What does the HSE expect employers to do?

The Health & Safety Executive expects every employer to:

– Ensure staff are provided with adequate and achievable demands

– Ensure employee skills and abilities are matched to the job

– Address staff concerns about their work environment are addressed.

The HSE recommends a five-step approach to risk assessment:

– Look for the hazards

– Decide who might be harmed and how

– Evaluate the risk and decide what needs to be done

– Record your findings

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

– Monitor and review.

www.hse.gov.uk




 

Michael Millar

previous post
UK plc needs to provide more vocational training
next post
Breaking the sicknote cycle

You may also like

Why HR burnout is a strategic issue

12 May 2025

Preparing for a new era of workforce planning...

8 May 2025

Two-thirds of school leaders suffering mental ill health

6 May 2025

Employers urged to do more to tackle loneliness

1 May 2025

Why employers must do more to support all...

24 Apr 2025

Nearly half did not take even one full...

14 Apr 2025

Quarter feel their employer is ineffective at managing...

11 Apr 2025

Gen X storing up health problems by failing...

28 Mar 2025

Hospitality and shift workers struggling with burnout

28 Mar 2025

Employee Benefits Awards 2025 shortlist revealed

24 Mar 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+