Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Age discriminationEmployment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionPay & benefitsHealth insurance

Weekly dilemma: Insurance benefits for older workers

by Personnel Today 21 Jan 2008
by Personnel Today 21 Jan 2008

We have just had a quote for renewing our medical insurance policy. We have several workers aged over 65 and if we cover them too, the overall cost increases substantially. Can we exclude these workers from the insurance?

First, a practical point – many group insurance schemes do not have any age criteria, so the problem may be solved simply by changing insurers. Otherwise, the legal implications of excluding older workers need to be considered.

Withdrawing any contractual benefit without the employee’s consent amounts to a breach of contract, which could result in constructive and unfair dismissal claims. However, employment contracts often state that certain benefits are discretionary and, where the wording permits, they can usually be withdrawn or changed without the employee’s consent.

Withdrawing benefits from staff aged over 65 will be discriminatory under the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, unless this can be objectively justified as ‘a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim’.

It is unclear whether cost considerations alone can comprise a legitimate aim to justify discrimination. Case law suggests that it can only be considered along with other justifications (if there are any). The government’s Coming of Age (July 2005) consultation suggested that while factors such as business needs and efficiency may be legitimate, discrimination is not justified merely because it may be more expensive not to. Hopefully, case law will clarify this question.

If you do withdraw insurance benefits for older workers, the recent tribunal case of Bloxham v Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer illustrates the need to consult thoroughly and document the reasons for doing so. You must consider whether other, less discriminatory steps can be taken – weighing up all available options and then documenting a comparative analysis of the costs of providing the benefit to all employees against other options, such as different insurance providers, or even withdrawing the benefit from all employees.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

If the benefit is contractual and you decide to withdraw it, you will need your employees’ agreement. Paying staff to buy their own insurance privately appears attractive, but it risks claims of indirect age discrimination from older workers whose private insurance will cost more than that of their younger colleagues.

Laurence Rees, partner, Reed Smith Richards Butler

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
Emergency time off to care for dependants
next post
Making takeovers easier to swallow

You may also like

Lidl enters agreement with EHRC to prevent sexual...

22 Aug 2025

X settles severance claims of former Twitter employees

22 Aug 2025

Employee Benefits Live 2025 conference programme unveiled

21 Aug 2025

Council defends suggested alternatives to ‘husband’ and ‘wife’

21 Aug 2025

Midwife files belief claim after Trust reported social...

20 Aug 2025

‘Noisy and boisterous’ younger colleagues not age-related harassment

20 Aug 2025

Personnel Today Awards 2025 shortlist: Employment Law Firm...

20 Aug 2025

British Transport Police first force to hire part-time...

19 Aug 2025

Eurostar’s Georgie Willis a keynote speaker at Employee...

19 Aug 2025

Lidl to increase entry-level hourly pay for 35,000...

15 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise