Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Civil ServiceEconomics, government & businessLatest NewsEmployment lawDepartment for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS)

Charity Age Concern slams Civil Service hypocrisy over retirement age

by Mike Berry 24 Jan 2007
by Mike Berry 24 Jan 2007

Government departments have been accused of “a shocking level of hypocrisy”  over ageism after claims that civil servants could be retired against their will.



The charity Age Concern said it had uncovered information showing that a number of departments had retained a mandatory retirement age, even though firms were being urged to let staff choose when they stopped work.



Parliamentary questions have revealed that the Privy Council Office, the Home Office, the Cabinet Office, the Treasury, the Departments of Health, Trade and Industry, Constitutional Affairs, International Development, Culture, Media and Sport, and Transport and all members of the senior civil service have a compulsory retirement age of 65.



Age Concern argues that this policy goes against statements from ministers following last year’s legislation aimed at outlawing ageism in the workplace.



Gordon Lishman, director general of Age Concern, said: “Ageism is wrong, and the government acknowledges it is wrong. Yet the government’s own departments are forcing people over 65 to stop working.



“Not only is it unfair, it shows a shocking level of hypocrisy within the government in terms of its attitude to ageism. This prejudice means that people who want or need to work for whatever reason are denied that right.”



A DTI spokeswoman said: “We use the age of 65 for business planning purposes but anyone who wants to work over the age of 65 has the right to request to work longer.”



Age Concern – through its membership organisation Heyday – has brought a legal challenge to provisions of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations that allow mandatory retirement ages.



 

Avatar
Mike Berry

previous post
Welsh factory closure ‘could lose Burberry its Royal Warrant’
next post
Employment Appeal Tribunal ruling on Royal Bank of Scotland’s stress unfair dismissal is a reprieve from disaster

You may also like

Sue Gray findings: Party culture during lockdowns approved...

25 May 2022

Employers lack data to make IR35 worker status...

25 May 2022

Biggest national rail strike threatens summer

25 May 2022

Six in 10 women of colour ‘hide identity’...

25 May 2022

Maternity leave: Cost of living crisis highlights need...

25 May 2022

Civil servants move closer to national strike action

25 May 2022

Top 10 metrics HR leaders are using today...

25 May 2022

Employees resigning in 2022: Survey shows ‘great resignation’...

24 May 2022

Tube strike on 6 June to see 4,000...

24 May 2022

Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022,...

24 May 2022
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+