Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise

Health and safetyOccupational HealthWellbeing

Companies paying too much for eyecare provision by not adhering to eyecare regulations

by Personnel Today 17 Dec 2008
by Personnel Today 17 Dec 2008

Specsavers Corporate Eyecare research highlight the extra costs companies are paying through not adhering to the DSE (Display Screen Equipment) regulations.

Companies suffering unnecessary costs

Whilst much of the misunderstanding results in the employees missing out, companies themselves are suffering unnecessary costs too. In 70% of cases, employees are allowed to choose which optician they visit. The regulations are, however, quite explicit in allowing employers to nominate a particular optometrist. By not doing so, employers could be spending far more on eyecare than is necessary.

Much of the confusion seems to be around the classification of a VDU ‘user’. Whilst 56% of companies state that employees who use a VDU for any amount of time are eligible for a company-funded eyetest, 15% say they have to work at a VDU for over 4 hours a day, 9% say 2 – 3 hours, 5% say up to an hour and 14% say they just do not know. Unfortunately, there is no specific time-length within the regulations. Specsavers recommends that if there is any element of doubt as to whether an individual is classed as a VDU user, it is often more cost-effective, and beneficial to the organisation, to include them in company-funded eyetests, rather than devote excessive time and effort seeking their exclusion.

Perceived costs and numbers

But this is, perhaps, where the problem lies. Nearly a quarter (23%) of all companies surveyed believe the cost of an eyetest plus glasses for VDU use would be over £100 and 84% believe it would be over £50. In fact, Specsavers offers a VDU Voucher for just £17, which will cover the cost of an eyetest and glasses for VDU use. Where an organisation does not have a clearly communicated eyecare policy in place, they are exposed to an employee presenting a bill for an eyetest, which can be up to £35 and for glasses, which could cost hundreds of pounds.

When it comes to needing glasses for VDU use, the numbers of employees affected is much lower than perceived: Nearly a third (31%) of companies believe that the proportion of employees who actually need glasses for VDU use is more than 30%. Over half (53%) of companies believe more than 20% of employees need glasses for VDU use. In fact, the actual figure is usually less than 10%.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Lack of understanding may be opening up companies to greater costs than necessary as 8% of companies insist that the employee must have an eyetest if they work with a VDU. This is, however, an unusual area of health and safety, in that whilst the employer must make the facilities available and effectively communicate such provision, the employee cannot be compelled to undertake the eye-test if they do not wish to do so. Equally, nearly a third (30%) of companies, offer company-funded eyetests on an annual basis when actually the regulations stipulate that the professional guidance of the optometrist should be followed. In practise this is often a two-year test cycle.


 

Personnel Today

Personnel Today articles are written by an expert team of award-winning journalists who have been covering HR and L&D for many years. Some of our content is attributed to "Personnel Today" for a number of reasons, including: when numerous authors are associated with writing or editing a piece; or when the author is unknown (particularly for older articles).

previous post
European Parliament votes to scrap UK working time opt-out
next post
Midlands law firm, Browne Jacobson, pilot new 360 system with Bowland Solutions

You may also like

Workers need more protection from heatwaves, says WHO

22 Aug 2025

What will new workplace heat guidance mean for...

22 Aug 2025

Employee Benefits Live 2025 conference programme unveiled

21 Aug 2025

Violence against A&E staff has doubled, warns RCN

12 Aug 2025

Reform fit notes to recover falling over-50s employment

11 Aug 2025

HR leaders back idea of wellbeing tax break

5 Aug 2025

The evolving role of employee assistance programmes

4 Aug 2025

Third of workers do not use workplace health...

4 Aug 2025

Police uniforms don’t fit the bill, research reveals

1 Aug 2025

Top 10 HR questions July 2025: Unauthorised absence

1 Aug 2025

  • Elevate your L&D strategy at the World of Learning 2025 SPONSORED | This October...Read more
  • How to employ a global workforce from the UK (webinar) WEBINAR | With an unpredictable...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Recruitment & retention
    • Wellbeing
    • Occupational Health
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise