Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Tribunal WatchReasonable adjustmentsCase lawDisability discriminationDisability

Disabled shop worker wins tribunal award from M&S over lift key

by Stephen Simpson 15 Jan 2018
by Stephen Simpson 15 Jan 2018

An employment tribunal has made an award of £1,000 against Marks and Spencer after a delay in providing a disabled shop worker with a lift key to allow him to reach the toilets more easily. We round up recent tribunal decisions.

£1,000 award for disabled shop worker over delay in providing £3 lift key

In Mitchell v Marks and Spencer plc, the employment tribunal held that the employer breached its duty under the Equality Act 2010 to make reasonable adjustments for disabled workers.

Delay in making reasonable adjustment: tribunal’s view:

“…there can be little excuse or explanation for the respondent as an organisation, in the circumstances, not providing the claimant with a key for 10 days when there were keys available and when the cost of cutting a further key was agreed to be £3.”

Mr Mitchell has a disability that requires him to go to the toilet frequently. He reached the second-floor staff toilets using the goods lift, the stairs, or a combination of the escalator and the stairs.

An operation meant that Mr Mitchell anticipated more frequent toilet visits. He said that both before and after the operation he raised the issue of getting a lift key to the customer lift with various managers. While he waited for a key to be cut, he could use the goods lift.

After his operation, he was not provided with a customer lift key and chased the issue up with management. A key to the customer lift was provided for him about 10 days after his operation.

Mr Mitchell claimed disability discrimination in the employment tribunal, which upheld his claim by a majority.

The employment tribunal accepted that using the customer lift rather than the goods lift did make a difference for Mr Mitchell, in terms of “speed, reliability and convenience”.

The tribunal rejected the employer’s argument, albeit by a majority, that there was not much difference between using the customer lift and using the goods lift.

The tribunal awarded £1,000 to Mr Mitchell for injury to feelings.

Other recent disability discrimination cases

Employer liable for treatment based on perceived disability

Claimant’s colour blindness not a disability

Salesman loses claim following “fat pikey” comment

The employment tribunal accepted the employer’s arguments that the award should be low because of the short length of the delay, the lack of malice or deliberate conduct and the “relatively minor character of the injury to feelings”.

Read more details of the case and the full judgment…

Other tribunal decisions available online

Ginger v Department of Work and Pensions On 29 November 2017, an employment tribunal awarded £24,392 to a women undergoing IVF treatment who was questioned by her line manager about her ability to cope with a second child.

Sekander v Rocketmill Ltd On 14 November 2017, an employment tribunal held that an underperforming employee was unfairly dismissed after he was suspended rather than given the chance to improve.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

De Groen v Gan Menachem Hendon Ltd On 14 November 2017, an employment tribunal held that an Orthodox Jewish nursery school that dismissed an unmarried teacher for cohabiting committed religious and sex discrimination.

relx_copyright – This article is Brightmine content – Copyright 2024 LexisNexis Risk Solutions

M&S
Stephen Simpson

Stephen Simpson is Principal HR Strategy and Practice Editor at Brightmine. His areas of responsibility include the policies and documents and law reports. After obtaining a law degree and training to be a solicitor, he moved into publishing, initially with Butterworths. He joined Brightmine in its early days in 2001.

previous post
Blue Monday: Prioritise mental health support to reduce absence
next post
Former Royal British Legion employee wins constructive dismissal case

You may also like

Ethnicity and disability pay gaps: Ready to report?...

1 Jul 2025

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Welfare cuts would ‘undermine workforce inclusion and business...

27 Jun 2025

HR manager with ‘messy’ work loses discrimination case

25 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

WFH employee who falsified timesheets loses unfair dismissal...

16 Jun 2025

School’s bid to appeal Kristie Higgs ruling refused...

11 Jun 2025

Court rejects Liberty’s legal challenge against EHRC consultation

9 Jun 2025

US Supreme Court lowers burden of proof for...

6 Jun 2025

Swearing chef awarded £13,000 for disability discrimination

4 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+