Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Equality, diversity and inclusionGenderGender pay gap

Failure to report gender pay gap could result in more than reputational damage

by Jo Faragher 7 Dec 2016
by Jo Faragher 7 Dec 2016

Employers could face legal consequences if they fail to comply with the new gender pay gap rules, which were published in draft form yesterday.

It had been suggested in earlier drafts that organisations that failed to comply would effectively be “shamed” into doing so.

This is the first time there has been any suggestion of penalising employers for non-compliance, despite much speculation over the final content of the Regulations.

The Equality Act 2010 (Gender Pay Gap Information) Regulations 2017 were finally published yesterday after many months of waiting.

There is a reference within the explanatory notes that accompany the Regulations that suggests a failure to comply with the new rules – which require employers with more than 250 employees to publish their gender pay gaps from April next year – would be an “unlawful act … which empowers the Equality and Human Rights Commission to take enforcement action”.

Gender pay gap resources

Hot topic: gender pay gap reporting

Frequently asked questions: gender pay gap reporting 

How to measure and report a gender pay gap

This would mean that the EHRC could use its powers to investigate employers who fail to publish their gender pay metrics if they are required to.

Kelly Thomson, legal director at law firm RPC, explained that the Equality Act 2006 gives the EHRC various enforcement powers in relation to “unlawful acts”.

She said: “Although the EHRC does not have unlimited resources, the powers at their disposal include powers to: investigate, issue unlawful act notices, require production of an action plan and apply to court for an injunction to restrain unlawful acts.

“Many employers will already feel that the potential reputational risk of non-compliance with the new gender pay gap reporting regime provides sufficient incentive.

“That said, the additional spectre of enforcement action by the Commission would give further teeth to the new requirements. The Government had previously indicated it would review the Regulations in the years following implementation to decide whether there was a need to introduce sanctions such as fines.”

It has been confirmed that large employers’ duty to report on their gender pay gap will come into force on 6 April 2017, and will apply to “relevant” employees in England, Wales and Scotland (but not Northern Ireland).

Employers must publish a report within 12 months of that date on their website.

Commenting on the suggestion that employers could be at risk of acting unlawfully, Clare Gregory, a partner in the employment group at law firm DLA Piper said: “This means that reputational issues may not be the only issue employers need to be concerned with if they do not meet their obligations in full.”

She added: “During the long wait, there has been much speculation, combined with no small amount of hope, that the final obligations on employers would be much less complex and confusing than outlined in the initial draft Regulations.

“To a small extent, the Government has addressed some of the concerns – for example there is much-needed clarification over how to calculate the quartile pay bands, which will contain the proportions of male and female employees in each band, ranked from lowest paid to highest paid.”

But Kirsti Laird, a senior associate at Charles Russell Speechlys, said that employers should not be too concerned over potential consequences as long as their practices are fair and nondiscriminatory.

“The new comment is not itself part of the Regulations – nowhere in the Regulations is there any suggestion of penalties or enforcement action.

“Failing to report a gender pay gap will not be an unlawful act in itself, it merely reminds employers that the EHRC has the powers to investigate, which it did already.”

Mark Crail, content director at XpertHR, added: “When the draft Regulations were first published, the suggestion was that employers that failed to comply would be named and shamed into doing so. There simply was no other means of enforcing them.

“So it comes as something of a surprise to discover in almost the final footnote to the final draft that the EHRC may now be able to take legal action against organisations that do not report their gender pay gap in line with the Regulations.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“In many ways, the change makes sense. Any organisation that decided to ignore the reporting requirement was probably not going to be too concerned about naming and shaming.

“But it does alter the scale and significance of the Regulations – and HR departments charged with the reporting task will now need to ensure they engage properly with their legal team and with the board about what they are doing.”

Jo Faragher

Jo Faragher has been an employment and business journalist for 20 years. She regularly contributes to Personnel Today and writes features for a number of national business and membership magazines. Jo is also the author of 'Good Work, Great Technology', published in 2022 by Clink Street Publishing, charting the relationship between effective workplace technology and productive and happy employees. She won the Willis Towers Watson HR journalist of the year award in 2015 and has been highly commended twice.

previous post
Trade Union Act 2016: Draft rules on public service industrial action unveiled
next post
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): an employer’s guide

You may also like

Ethnicity and disability pay gaps: Ready to report?...

1 Jul 2025

One in eight senior NHS managers from black...

1 Jul 2025

Co-op equal pay claims move onto next stage

30 Jun 2025

Progressive DEI policy is a red line for...

27 Jun 2025

BBC Breakfast bullying and misconduct allegations under investigation

20 Jun 2025

Finance professionals expect less emphasis on ESG and...

18 Jun 2025

Lack of role models a ‘barrier’ for people...

17 Jun 2025

Pride 2025: why corporate allyship still matters

16 Jun 2025

EHRC defends interim update as ‘balance of clarity...

13 Jun 2025

HR is second ‘most sexist profession’ survey suggests

13 Jun 2025

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+