Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Collective redundancyCoronavirusEconomics, government & businessLatest NewsJob Support Scheme

Job Support Scheme ‘won’t reduce job losses’

by Ashleigh Webber 25 Sep 2020
by Ashleigh Webber 25 Sep 2020 James W Copeland / Shutterstock.com
James W Copeland / Shutterstock.com

The Job Support Scheme (JSS) will not save enough jobs and could be improved if the government scraps its ‘poorly targeted’ Job Retention Bonus.

This is according to the Resolution Foundation think tank, which believes that unemployment could still be at its highest level in a generation next spring despite the raft of measures designed to protect “viable” jobs outlined by chancellor Rishi Sunak yesterday.

Will your organisation use the Job Support Scheme?

Take part in our short survey now

“While the chancellor has rightly aimed to create a European-style short-hours working scheme, design flaws mean that the new Job Support Scheme will not live up to its promise to significantly reduce the rise in unemployment,” said Resolution Foundation chief executive Torsten Bell.

“Those mistakes could be addressed by scrapping the poorly targeted £7.5 billion Job Retention Bonus, and using those funds to ensure the new support scheme gives firms the right incentives to cut hours rather than jobs.

“While households have to date been protected from the worst of the economic hit from the pandemic, that is about to change. The coming rise in unemployment will mean a major living standards squeeze for families this winter.”

According to the think tank’s analysis of the chancellor’s Winter Economy Plan, there is little or no incentive for employers to use the scheme to protect as many jobs as possible.

It claims it would cost more for an organisation to employ two part-time workers under the scheme than one full-time worker – based on the cost of continuing to employ the average previously-furloughed worker.

For example, it would cost a firm £1,500 per month to employ one full-time worker on an annual salary of £17,000 (including employer national insurance contributions), but more than £2,000 per month to employ two half-time workers on the same full-time equivalent salary.

Employers would have to pay half of the 67p the worker receives for each £1 of lost wages from the hours they do not work, in addition to the pay for the hours the worker does work. The Resolution Foundation says this is almost twice as big a payment for hours not worked (estimated at £312 a month for the average worker protected under the JSS) as the employer would have had to cover under the furlough scheme for an employee on the average furlough wage (£1,400 per month).

“The scheme itself provides no incentive for firms to cut hours rather than jobs, seriously limiting its ability to stem the increase in unemployment this Autumn,” says the report.

Shifts the cliff-edge

It says the one-off £1,000 bonus per retained previously-furloughed worker under the Job Retention Bonus scheme “merely shifts the jobs cliff-edge to the end of January from the end of October”. Firms claiming the JSS will need to commit to making no redundancies during the period they are claiming the support, but the Resolution Foundation says redundancies “can kick in immediately afterwards”.

Employer support post-furlough

Chancellor unveils Job Support Scheme to curb winter job losses

Job Support Scheme: two thirds of two thirds?

Employers to receive £1k bonus for bringing staff back from furlough

For there to be a sufficient incentive for employers to use the scheme, workers’ wages need to be low enough so the costs of the JSS are outweighed by the flat-rate bonus.

“Of course, an employer’s decision to retain or let workers go during this downturn will not be based simply on short-term economic considerations: most will wish to keep employees if they can reasonably do so in order not to lose accumulated knowledge.

“It stands to reason, then, that firms with higher skilled and/or more strongly attached staff are more likely to absorb the additional costs of the JSS in order to keep employees on board than those with a more transient or replaceable workforce,” the report says.

Notably absent from the Winter Economy Plan were policies to stimulate new hiring, it says.

“As the Treasury seem to have taken the position that they are happy to see a large big labour market shake-out over the next few months – with jobs that are not allowed to continue under current restrictions or no longer profitable coming to an end – it was surprising – and worrying – that there were no additional measures taken to encourage job creation by the private sector, or to support direct job creation by the public sector,” the Resolution Foundation says.

“Policies like this will be vital if those shaken out from their old jobs are to find new jobs: as we argued earlier, the underlying rate of job creation in the UK economy will be far lower than the size of the imminent flows into unemployment.”

HR Director opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more HR director jobs

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and part of the Personnel Today editorial team. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport.

previous post
No ‘cooling off period’ for skilled workers relocating to the UK
next post
Occupational Health & Wellbeing Awards 2020 shortlist: OH team of the year (public sector)

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Prime minister steps up calls for 90,000 civil...

13 May 2022

Green energy jobs given lift by new Delivery...

12 May 2022

McColl’s administration puts 16,000 jobs at risk

6 May 2022

Latest job advert figures point to growing economic...

5 May 2022

Passport Office: private firm told to hire more...

28 Apr 2022

Pandemic shifted labour market to low-skill, low pay

25 Apr 2022

Foodservice group to create 32,000 new jobs

22 Apr 2022

Hiring confidence hit by national insurance rise and...

20 Apr 2022

Planned redundancies rise 103% in one month

11 Apr 2022

Sainsbury’s increases wages for second time in four...

8 Apr 2022
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

TOPICS

Economics, government & business
Employee Relations
Employment law
Equality & diversity
Global HR
HR practice
HR strategy
Learning & training
Occupational health
Pay & benefits
Recruitment & retention
HR Tech
Wellbeing
All HR topics

WHAT’S HOT

Apprenticeship levy
Brexit
Covid-19 coronavirus
Gender pay gap reporting
Gig economy
Holiday pay
HR tech
IR35
Immigration
People analytics
Zero-hours contracts

JOBS

Post a job
Why advertise with us?
Change Management
Compensation & Benefits
Diversity & Inclusion
Employee Relations
Employment Law
Health & Safety
HR (General)
HR Business Partner
HR Director
HR Consultant
HR Shared Services
HR Systems
People Analytics
Learning & Development
Training
Occupational Health
Organisational Development
Payroll
Performance & Engagement
Recruitment & Resourcing
Talent Management
Wellbeing
Workforce Planning

ABOUT

About Personnel Today
Contact us
Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022
RSS feeds
Advertising specifications
Email Newsletters
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards

Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits Awards
Employee Benefits Live

Forum for Expatriate Management

OHW+
OHW+ membership

Whatmedia

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+