Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Collective bargainingLatest NewsEmployee relationsCase lawTrade unions

Supreme Court to hear ‘unlawful inducements’ appeal

by Ashleigh Webber 17 Feb 2020
by Ashleigh Webber 17 Feb 2020 Photo: Lazyllama / Shutterstock
Photo: Lazyllama / Shutterstock

The Supreme Court will consider whether an automotive parts firm made “unlawful inducements” when it bypassed a trade union and made a pay offer to staff directly.

It has allowed the appeal by the Unite union, which argued it was unlawful for Kostal UK to send a letter to staff that asked them to agree a pay deal that had been rejected by their trade union.

Negotiating with trade unions

Unlawful inducements decision overturned by Court of Appeal

Six steps to negotiating terms and conditions with a trade union

Outsourcing: How the IWGB nearly overturned collective bargaining rules

In December 2015 the company wrote to employees directly, urging them to accept the offer individually or risk losing their £270 Christmas bonus if they did not.

The offer was then repeated in January 2016 to those who had not agreed to the deal and were threatened with dismissal if they did not accept it.

Last year, the Court of Appeal overturned the decisions made by the Sheffield employment tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal in the case of Kostal UK v Dunkley & Others. It ruled in the company’s favour, whereas the two lower courts found it had acted unlawfully when it approached the union members directly for the purpose of ceasing collective bargaining.

Section 145B of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 prohibits an employer from making offers to members of a recognised trade union (or one seeking to be recognised), where the purpose of the offer is to cease collective bargaining.

At a date yet to be set, the Supreme Court will hear the union’s appeal against the Court of Appeal’s ruling.

Unite assistant general secretary Howard Beckett said: “We are delighted that the Supreme Court has allowed Unite’s appeal against the extremely disappointing Court of Appeal’s decision last summer to overturn the previous rulings of an employment appeal tribunal and employment tribunal.

“This is a case which goes right to the heart of trade union recognition and the right to collectively bargain. It is one that we will continue to pursue to protect trade union rights and to get justice for our members.”

If successful in its appeal, the union claimed that its members at Kostal UK could be entitled to thousands in compensation. In 2017, the employment tribunal ordered the firm to pay staff more than £420,000.

Employee relations opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more Employee Relations jobs

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport magazines, touching on some of the employment and wellbeing issues experienced by those in road haulage.

previous post
M&S to close distribution centres with hundreds of job losses
next post
Six essential GDPR steps for HR – Download the e-book now

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Royal Mail managers vote to strike over restructure

30 Jun 2022

Heathrow-based cabin crew set for 18% pay rise

28 Jun 2022

British Airways employees at Heathrow vote for walkouts

24 Jun 2022

Government to repeal agency workers ban during strikes

23 Jun 2022

Inflation in May 2022 at 40-year high, as...

22 Jun 2022

Rail strike: PM calls for pay compromise to...

21 Jun 2022

‘General strike’ threat looms as unions voice pay...

20 Jun 2022

Rail strike: Shapps hints again at repeal of...

17 Jun 2022

Bolt drivers strike as union launches workers’ rights...

15 Jun 2022

Shapps suggests repeal of agency worker ban during...

13 Jun 2022
  • NSPCC revamps its learning strategy with child wellbeing at its heart PROMOTED | The NSPCC’s mission is to prevent abuse and neglect...Read more
  • Diversity versus inclusion: Why the difference matters PROMOTED | It’s possible for an environment to be diverse, but not inclusive...Read more
  • Five steps for organisations across the globe to become more skills-driven PROMOTED | The shift in the world of work has been felt across the globe...Read more
  • The future of workforce development PROMOTED | Northumbria University and partners share insight...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+