Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Right to workBrexitLatest NewsLabour marketMigrant workers

MAC report: New immigration system should not favour EEA migrants

by Ashleigh Webber 18 Sep 2018
by Ashleigh Webber 18 Sep 2018 The MAC advises that the immigration system should favour skilled workers, such as doctors and nurses
The MAC advises that the immigration system should favour skilled workers, such as doctors and nurses

A post-Brexit immigration system should make it easier for highly-skilled workers to move to the UK and should not favour EU migrants, the Migration Advisory Committee (MAC) has recommended.

Its final report on the impact migration from the European Economic Area (EEA) has on the UK economy and society recommends that workers from EEA countries should not be given preference over those from other nations in post-Brexit immigration policy.

Migrant workers

Doctors and nurses to be excluded from Tier 2 visa cap

How to retain a sponsor licence

Kerry Garcia, partner at immigration law firm Stevens & Bolton, said it was surprising that the MAC found no compelling reason to suggest a different set of immigration rules for EEA and non-EEA workers.

“The MAC comments that there will be winners and losers under any new immigration system,” she said. “It’s clear though that if the government acts upon these recommendations all EEA nationals will be the losers. Even if they qualify under the new immigration rules, they would need a visa or entry clearance before being able to come to the UK to work or settle and would need to meet the eligibility requirements of the new system.”

The MAC report recommends the new economic migration policy should give greater preference to highly-skilled workers, while restricting access for lower-skilled workers to enter the UK.

One possibility could be extending the Tier 2 (General) scheme – which highly-skilled workers from non-EEA countries currently use to apply for a visa – to workers from the EU. However, the MAC warns that several changes would need to be made, including:

  • abolishing the monthly and annual caps on the number of visas that can be issued under the Tier 2 (General) scheme;
  • bringing those that apply for medium-skilled jobs under the remit of Tier 2 (General), not just high-skilled jobs as at present;
  • expanding the list of eligible occupations under the scheme;
  • abolishing the resident labour market test, which requires employers to advertise the job on offer to UK citizens; and,
  • making it easier for migrant workers to change employers once they are in the UK.

Immigration skills charge

Meanwhile, employers that sponsor an EEA national would need to pay the immigration skills charge of up to £5,000 per migrant, pushing up the cost of employing an overseas worker over a UK-based one.

The report also says that a specific work migration route for low-skilled workers is not needed, with the possible exception of a scheme for seasonal agricultural workers. Instead, lower-skilled staff could be recruited through an expansion of the Tier 5 youth mobility scheme.

“Low skilled workers and businesses which are reliant upon those workers, such as the catering and hospitality sectors, appear to be the greatest losers if these proposals go ahead,” said Garcia.

“It’s far from clear where businesses in these sectors will be able to find sufficient workers from within the UK workforce. Certainly anecdotal evidence suggests they will really struggle. Indeed, the MAC itself acknowledges this will be strongly opposed by the affected sectors.”

Recruitment & Employment Confederation chief executive Neil Carberry was skeptical of the recommendation to expand the Tier 5 youth mobility scheme to those seeking low-skilled roles. He said allowing only low-skilled work through this route this would “damage integration and progression routes for migrant workers”.

A blast from the past

Jonathan Beech, managing director at law firm Migrate UK, said some of the report’s suggestions were “a blast from the past” that provided options for some migrant workers not seen since 2012.

Meanwhile, the CIPD thought the MAC had failed to recognise the balance of skills and labour needed in the UK.

Its head of public policy, Ben Willmott, commented: “Taken together, the recommendations look overly bureaucratic and restrictive. Our research consistently shows that employers are recruiting EU workers into low-skilled roles because they can’t recruit UK-born workers into these roles, not in an effort to pay lower wages or avoid training.”

Jessica Pattinson, head of immigration at law firm Dentons, said organisations that rely on EU workers to fill low-skilled or seasonal vacancies should consider how best to retain their current workforce, as replacing them will likely become difficult after the UK leaves the EU.

The MAC report also finds that EEA migrants have little or no impact on overall employment or training opportunities in the UK and have little effect on wage growth.

Last month, Office for National Statistics figures revealed that the annual number of EU citizens moving to the UK in the 12 months to March 2018 fell to its lowest level since 2012.

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and part of the Personnel Today editorial team. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport.

previous post
JLR week reduced as Mini plant schedules one-month post-Brexit closure
next post
Employee assistance calls for mental health issues rise by nearly a third

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Steep rise in visas for non-EU migrant workers

19 May 2022

Nurses leaving due to pressure and workplace culture

18 May 2022

How firms need to comply with sponsor licence...

16 May 2022

Fears over skills as visa application times double...

12 May 2022

How the Global Business Mobility visa will overhaul...

14 Apr 2022

Digital right-to-work checks: what should employers do to...

13 Apr 2022

The UK Expansion Worker route: a solution for...

8 Apr 2022

Immigration schemes need revision to tackle farming staff...

6 Apr 2022

Scale-up visas: How employers can hire international talent

16 Mar 2022

UK businesses join consortium to recruit Ukrainian refugees

14 Mar 2022
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+