Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Case lawNorthern IrelandEmployment lawLatest NewsHolidays and holiday pay

Supreme Court to hear historical holiday underpayments case

by Ashleigh Webber 13 Dec 2022
by Ashleigh Webber 13 Dec 2022 William Barton / Shutterstock.com
William Barton / Shutterstock.com

The Supreme Court is this week set to hear yet another case that could affect how employers calculate holiday pay, and clarify the method for determining whether an employee should receive back pay in cases where there has been a break in underpayments.

In the case of Chief Constable of The Police Service of Northern Ireland and another v Agnew and others, the Supreme Court will decide whether historic holiday pay claims can be brought where there are gaps of three months or more between periods of underpayment.

The hearing will take place on 14-16 December 2022, with a decision expected in 2023.

In England, Scotland and Wales, a claim for holiday pay deductions must be brought within three months of the deduction, or within three months of the last deduction in the case of a series of underpayments. However, the Supreme Court’s ruling has the potential to change that.

In 2019, the Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland (NICA) found staff had not received the holiday pay they had been entitled to for many years. This meant that the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) could owe back pay of around £30m.

Recent holiday pay rulings

Supreme Court: Holiday pay for part-year staff should not be pro-rated

Pimlico Plumbers holiday pay ruling: four steps for employers

Pimlico Plumbers loses holiday pay appeal in case with ‘huge’ implications

The case was brought by Unison on behalf of a PSNI employee, Mr Agnew, and 3,700 colleagues, following the Employment Appeal Tribunal’s ruling in Bear Scotland v Fulton in 2014. In that case, the EAT found that regular overtime, which employees are obliged to perform if requested by the employer, should be included in holiday pay calculations. PSNI had not been paying employees in this way.

To protect employers from facing claims for back pay potentially going back to 1998, when the Working Time Regulations were introuced, the Bear Scotland judgment said that any such claims would not succeed where there had been a gap of three months or more between holiday underpayments.

To further reduce the impact of the Bear Scotland ruling, the Deduction from Wages (Limitation) Regulations 2014 came into effect in 2015 and introduced a “backstop” period which prevented employees from making unlawful deductions from wages claims, including claims for holiday pay, from more than two years ago. However, this was not introduced in Northern Ireland.

NICA’s judgment said there was nothing in the Employment Rights (Northern Ireland) Order 1996 that set a limit on the length of gaps between unlawful deductions, and concluded that a three month period where the employee had been correctly paid would not break a series of deductions and prevent claims.

It indicated that if the underpayments could be linked, then they could form a series, even if they were more than three months apart.

PSNI disagreed with this and lodged an appeal with the highest court in the UK. If the Supreme Court agrees with NICA’s ruling, many employers across Great Britain and Northern Ireland could face claims for holiday underpayment.

The Supreme Court will also consider whether the respondents have been discriminated against under the European Convention on Human Rghts.

If the Supreme Court opts to follow the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in the Agnew case – which was that any holiday day is a combination of all types of leave – this will create a real practical problem for businesses” – Lesley Rennie, WorkNest

Lesley Rennie, principal employment law solicitor at WorkNest, said the Supreme Court’s recent comments in Smith v Pimlico, gives an indication that it supports Agnew’s view that a series of underpayments is not broken if there are more than three months between them, and that a correct payment does not break the chain.

“If this is the case, an employer’s potential liability for historic underpayments will be greatly increased, although there is generally a two-year limitation on claims in Scotland and England,” she said.

“The second point is whether any given holiday day can be described as being solely Working Time Directive (WTD) leave or solely Working Time Regulation (WTR) leave, or if it is a combination of all leave. If the Supreme Court opts to follow the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in the Agnew case – which was that any holiday day is a combination of all types of leave – this will create a real practical problem for businesses.

“Pay for WTD leave days must reflect normal remuneration so it must take into account things such as commission, allowances and overtime. If we must distinguish between WTD and WTR leave, businesses would need to carry out complex calculations to work out what element of each makes up a holiday day and pay it accordingly or apply a blanket approach of paying all holiday days at the rate of ‘normal remuneration’.”

Rennie said that employers should review their holiday practices now to ensure that WTD leave is paid at normal remuneration going forward and assess whether there have been any underpayments within the last two years.

“Whilst this is a Northern Irish case, the Supreme Court’s decision will be binding throughout the UK. That means that employment tribunals in Scotland and England will have to follow it,” she said.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today


Browse more human resources jobs

 

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor of OHW+ and HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport magazines, touching on some of the employment and wellbeing issues experienced by those in road haulage.

previous post
MAC urges caution over new visa routes, despite worker shortages
next post
Pay settlements at 31-year high

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Top 10 HR questions November 2023: Holiday carry-over

4 Dec 2023

Legal expert calls new holiday pay regulations ‘incoherent’

30 Nov 2023

Irregular hours workers and holiday pay entitlement

30 Nov 2023

Regulator withdraws holiday pay brief for staffing providers

10 Nov 2023

Rolled-up holiday pay to be introduced for workers...

8 Nov 2023

Top 10 HR questions October 2023: holiday entitlement

2 Nov 2023

Storm Ciarán: five common employer queries about severe...

1 Nov 2023

Bank holidays: six things employers need to know

26 Oct 2023

How to manage time off requests over Christmas

9 Oct 2023

HMRC annualised hours pilot angers union

6 Oct 2023

  • How to spot and tackle imposter syndrome in the workplace PROMOTED | Half of all UK adults...Read more
  • BetterMe for Business: How to Build Wellness Culture at Work PROMOTED | Ever encountered a...Read more
  • Global growth with simple HR compliance (webinar) WEBINAR | In an increasingly global marketplace...Read more
  • Talent acquisition: How AI can complement a ‘back to basics’ approach PROMOTED | Artificial intelligence is now...Read more
  • What will it mean to be an HR professional in 2024? (webinar) WEBINAR | As we approach 2024...Read more
  • HR Budget Planning for 2024: Preparing your People Strategy PROMOTED | As organisations continue to adapt...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2023

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2023 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+