Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

EthnicityLatest NewsEquality, diversity and inclusionRace discriminationEmployment tribunals

Worker wins race discrimination case after club met ‘fair-skinned dealer’ request

by Ashleigh Webber 2 Nov 2021
by Ashleigh Webber 2 Nov 2021 Claimant Semhar Tesfagiorgis arriving at the employment tribunal last month
PA Images / Alamy
Claimant Semhar Tesfagiorgis arriving at the employment tribunal last month
PA Images / Alamy

A Mayfair private members’ club discriminated against black employees when it accommodated a patron’s request for a ‘fair-skinned dealer’, an employment tribunal has found.

A unanimous judgment from the London Central Employment Tribunal said that Crown London Aspinalls had directly discriminated against claimant Semhar Tesfagiorgis because of her race and had treated her less favourably than other employees when it had complied with patrons’ requests for “fair-skinned female dealers” or “western-looking female staff”.

Tesfagiorgis claimed that in December 2019 she and a black colleague were prevented from working as dealers at a patron’s table because he had requested a white employee.

The casino told the tribunal that it felt it was necessary to accommodate patrons’ requests where possible in order to satisfy its customers, which was in its best interest as a business. It also felt dealers benefitted from supporting such requests because the players would likely return and pay more in tips.

The claimant took voluntary redundancy from the organisation in October 2020.

Race discrimination

Sharp rise at employment tribunals last year in race discrimination cases

Ethnic minority doctors twice as likely to face discrimination

Worker wins race discrimination claim at curry supplier

In her witness statement, Tesfagiorgis said the company’s managing director Mr Branson questioned her on whether he should turn away “a million-pound punter” when she raised a complaint. However, this was denied by Branson, who said he had told the claimant the customer would be spoken to. The tribunal favoured Branson’s version of events.

Tesfagiorgis also alleged that the company had prevented her from swapping a shift with a colleague in 2015 because a patron did not want a black dealer. This claim was brought out of time, but the tribunal agreed that had this been brought within the required timeframe it would have been considered unfavourable treatment and direct race discrimination.

The tribunal’s written judgment said: “Our finding is that the claimant and her black female colleagues were held back from going on duty because they were not ‘fair-skinned, female dealers’ or ‘western looking female staff’

“The accommodation of the request was direct race discrimination of the claimant because but for her race she would have been asked to deal to the patron. The granting of that request was less favourable treatment by the managers because of race.”

In a statement issued after the ruling, Tesfagiorgis said: “I tried for many years to open a dialogue about the racism myself and many others were often faced with but I was either shut down, ignored or gaslighted each time.

“The direct discrimination myself and other black colleagues received was not an isolated incident. Although the tribunal could not rule on past events due to time limits, they have acknowledged this was the case and for once Crown Aspinalls will finally be forced to do the same, for this I am grateful to the employment tribunal.”

The claimant made 26 claims against the company, 25 of which were dismissed.

Crown Resorts said in a statement: “Aspinalls notes the judgment by the tribunal in this matter, and we welcome the dismissal by the tribunal of all but one of the claimant’s complaints. Aspinalls is committed to creating a workplace for our employees and a venue for our patrons that is free of discrimination and harassment.

“We are pleased that the tribunal:

  • agreed that our senior managers did all they could to investigate and deal with the incident once it was brought to their attention in a supportive and informative manner; and
  • ­ did not accept the allegation that the company has a culture of discrimination
  • ­ 25 out of 26 claims were dismissed
  • one that succeeded was something always accepted shouldn’t have happened, defence was that we believed we’d taken all reasonable steps to make sure it wouldn’t happen but the tribunal considered our equalities training needed to be more specific to meet that threshold
  • earlier allegations re racial abuse not part of this hearing or judgment
  • found that senior managers took matters very seriously and dealt with the issue supportively and empathetically.

“The tribunal found that there was no harassment by Mr Branson or Ms Attrill and that the meetings with them were supportive and informative. They found Mr Branson empathised with the claimant at the 5 December 2019 meeting and sought to understand her complaints. They found as the fact that Mr Branson and Ms Attrill both acknowledged the gravity of the matter and Mr Branson undertook a wide-ranging investigation which showed the ‘weight’ he attached to the complaint.

“We take on board comments made by the tribunal about the efficacy of our equality training and will continue to work to ensure this is as effective as possible.”

D&I opportunities currently on PT Jobs


More D&I jobs
Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport magazines, touching on some of the employment and wellbeing issues experienced by those in road haulage.

previous post
Pay rises and better in-work benefits needed to retain staff, report finds
next post
Half feel their recruitment processes don’t improve D&I

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

AI recruitment systems to be investigated over discrimination...

14 Jul 2022

Wording of diversity statements critical to policies’ success

10 Jun 2022

Monkeypox advice for employers: working from home and...

26 May 2022

Aspers casino cashier excluded by colleagues wins £75k...

23 May 2022

EHRC’s legal fund for tackling race discrimination: what...

21 Apr 2022

Record ethnic diversity in NHS, but barriers to...

8 Apr 2022

P&O Ferries chef launches unfair dismissal and discrimination...

6 Apr 2022

Police forces must develop black talent, says racism...

22 Mar 2022

Serial claimant banned after ‘weaponising’ employment tribunal system

11 Mar 2022

Is the law confusing around positive action and...

25 Feb 2022
  • 6 reasons why work-based learning is better than traditional training PROMOTED | A recent Fortune/Deloitte survey found that 71% of CEOs are anticipating that this year’s biggest business disrupter...Read more
  • Strengthening Scotland’s public services through virtual recruiting PROMOTED | This website is Scotland's go-to place for job seekers looking to apply for roles in public services...Read more
  • What’s next for L&D? Enter Alchemist… PROMOTED | It’s time to turn off the tedious and get ready for interactive and immersive learning experiences...Read more
  • Simple mistakes are blighting the onboarding experience PROMOTED | The onboarding of new hires is a company’s best chance...Read more
  • Preventing Burnout: How can HR help key workers get the right help? PROMOTED | Workplace wellbeing may seem a distant memory...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+