Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Author

Eversheds HR Group

Eversheds HR Group

    • Case law
    • Employment law

    Forshaw, Chorley and Chorley v Archcraft Ltd, EAT, 13 December 2004

    by Eversheds HR Group 19 Apr 2005
    by Eversheds HR Group 19 Apr 2005

    Christopher Chorley (CC), James Chorley (JC) and David Forshaw (DF) were employed by Archcraft Ltd. The father of JC and...

    • Case law
    • Employee relations
    • Employment tribunals

    Mossman v Bray Management Ltd, Employment Appeal Tribunal, 20 December 2004

    by Eversheds HR Group 5 Apr 2005
    by Eversheds HR Group 5 Apr 2005

    Application out of time

    • Case law

    Cable & Wireless v Muscat, Employment Appeal Tribunal

    by Eversheds HR Group 29 Mar 2005
    by Eversheds HR Group 29 Mar 2005

    When is an employee still considered an employee?Cable & Wireless v Muscat, Employment Appeal TribunalMuscat was employed by EIL until,...

    • Case law

    Midland Packaging Ltd v Clark, EAT 14 February 2005

    by Eversheds HR Group 15 Mar 2005
    by Eversheds HR Group 15 Mar 2005

    A fax in time
    Midland Packaging Ltd v Clark, EAT 14 February 2005Midland Packaging Ltd wished to appeal against the...

    • Case law
    • Employment law
    • Dismissal

    Thorpe v Eaton Electrical Limited, 6 December 2004

    by Eversheds HR Group 1 Mar 2005
    by Eversheds HR Group 1 Mar 2005

    Prospects of success

    • Case law
    • Employment law
    • Redundancy

    Junk v Kuhnel, European Court of Justice January 2005

    by Eversheds HR Group 15 Feb 2005
    by Eversheds HR Group 15 Feb 2005

    Duty to consult

    • Case law
    • Pay & benefits
    • Holidays and holiday pay

    Smith v AJ Morrisroes & Sons Ltd and other appeals, EAT, 22 November 2004

    by Eversheds HR Group 25 Jan 2005
    by Eversheds HR Group 25 Jan 2005

    Smith v AJ Morrisroes & Sons Ltd and other appeals, EAT, 22 November 2004

    • Case law
    • Employee relations
    • Dispute resolution

    HM Prison Service v Beart, EAT, 26 October 2004

    by Eversheds HR Group 7 Dec 2004
    by Eversheds HR Group 7 Dec 2004

    No limit to compensationHM Prison Service v Beart, EAT, 26 October 2004Beart was an administrative officer with HM Prison Service....

    • Case law
    • Pay & benefits
    • Pay structures

    Clamp v Aerial Systems, EAT, 6 October 2004

    by Eversheds HR Group 30 Nov 2004
    by Eversheds HR Group 30 Nov 2004

    Reduction in pay for reduced hours is not a detrimentMr Clamp worked a 60-hour week, having opted out of the...

    • Case law
    • Employment law
    • Staff monitoring

    Covert surveillance justified

    by Eversheds HR Group 16 Nov 2004
    by Eversheds HR Group 16 Nov 2004

    Covert surveillance justifiedMcGowan v Scottish Water, EAT, 23 September 2004Scottish Water became suspicious that Mr McGowan, a worker at a...

    • Case law

    Damages in bullying case to be reconsidered

    by Eversheds HR Group 9 Nov 2004
    by Eversheds HR Group 9 Nov 2004

    Damages in bullying case to be reconsideredCantor Fitzgerald International v Horkulak, Court of Appeal, 14 October 2004In July 2003, the...

    • Case law

    Variation of contract proves expensive

    by Eversheds HR Group 9 Nov 2004
    by Eversheds HR Group 9 Nov 2004

    Variation of contract proves expensiveChubb Security Personnel Limited v Bates, EAT, 3 August 2004 Bates worked as a security guard...

    • Case law
    • Fixed-term contracts
    • Pay & benefits

    Ansell Computer Services Ltd v Richardson (HMIT), Special Commissioners, 29 July 2004

    by Eversheds HR Group 19 Oct 2004
    by Eversheds HR Group 19 Oct 2004

    Where does NI liability fall? Ansell, a software engineer, worked for clients on special defence projects under contracts that provided...

    • Case law
    • Employment law
    • TUPE

    Davies and Baig v Eton Air Limited, EAT, 22 July 2004

    by Eversheds HR Group 12 Oct 2004
    by Eversheds HR Group 12 Oct 2004

    Contract loss is not a TUPE issue: Davies and Baig worked for The Travel Company and dealt with the travel...

    • Case law

    Marks & Spencer Plc v Ryan, EAT, 10 September 2004

    by Eversheds HR Group 5 Oct 2004
    by Eversheds HR Group 5 Oct 2004

    Internal appeals and time limits: Ryan was summarily dismissed, and the Citizens Advice Bureau (CAB) advised her to exhaust her...

Newer Posts
Older Posts

  • Empowering working parents and productivity during the summer holidays SPONSORED | Businesses play a...Read more
  • AI is here. Your workforce should be ready. SPONSORED | From content creation...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+