Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsRecruitment & retentionDress codes

Tattoo bias could mean employers missing out on talent

by Ashleigh Webber 15 Mar 2018
by Ashleigh Webber 15 Mar 2018

Image bias could be causing employers to miss out on the best candidates, according to research that revealed the majority of recruiters believe having a tattoo could limit career progression.

A survey conducted by LinkedIn found that 88% of recruiters and HR professionals considered that tattoos limited a candidate’s career prospects, while three quarters said a person’s image played a significant part in the hiring process.

Four in 10 admitted that they had rejected a candidate with suitable experience because they had a visible tattoo. Around two-fifths said they had rejected a tattooed candidate because of strict employer dress codes.

Dress codes

What can an employer do if an employee refuses to comply with a dress code?

Government to publish workplace dress code guidance following high-heels petition

Just under half (47%) of recruiters said industry intolerance led them to find that people with tattoos could be unsuitable candidates, while 46% thought it showed a lack of professionalism.

Other elements of appearance also were considered during the recruitment process. A third (34%) claimed they would feel uncomfortable hiring someone who was wearing casual clothing, 26% would not feel happy hiring someone with visible piercings, and 21% were unsure about hiring a person with brightly-dyed hair.

Rebecca Drew, sales manager at LinkedIn Talent Solutions, said: “With almost a fifth of UK adults currently estimated as having a tattoo, the current attitude around visible tattoos and physical image means that businesses and recruiters could be missing out on top talent.”

Despite the survey findings, she said it was encouraging to see that employers and recruiters were taking steps to reduce image and tattoo bias, such as holding phone interviews, virtual reality assessments and screening candidates via bots to strip a person’s image out of the hiring process.

A third (32%) said phone interviews were the most beneficial in reducing image bias, while 28% said virtual reality assessments would help. Screening was favoured by 21% of those surveyed.

“As we continue to see AI tools incorporated into hiring processes, we hope this will help recruiters remove some of the human bias from the process, and focus on judging candidate potential against the most important things,” added Drew.

Of 2,000 job seekers surveyed, 80% of those with tattoos said they had never felt they had been rejected from a job opportunity because of their visible tattoos, while 34% said they didn’t think a tattoo would hold their career back.

Ashleigh Webber
Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is editor at OHW+ and part of the Personnel Today editorial team. Prior to joining Personnel Today in 2018, she covered the road transport sector for Commercial Motor and Motor Transport.

previous post
Employer childcare voucher schemes get six-month reprieve
next post
Building executive search in-house? Six mistakes to avoid

1 comment

Avatar
Bryan G 8 Apr 2018 - 2:58 pm

You are right. But it also means the the person who was covered in tattoos could miss out on opportunities. Add on top of the fact that the job seeker chose to be covered in tattoos and you have the responsibility sitting on the job seekers head. So using words like “Tattoo Bias” just means leave the door open for people to not own their own dirt and point a finger and try to blame someone for the ramifications of their own choices.

Reply

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Boris Johnson’s partygate fixed penalty notice: any lessons...

14 Apr 2022

Christian nurse dismissed for wearing cross necklace wins...

6 Jan 2022

Office etiquette: time to stamp out pandemic ‘bad...

17 Sep 2021

Nursery worker asked to show less cleavage loses...

15 Sep 2021

Does the ‘new normal’ mean a new dress...

10 Sep 2021

Summer 2021: six potential issues for employers

20 Jul 2021

Headscarf ruling is a blow to inclusion

20 Jul 2021

European court allows employers to ban religious clothing

16 Jul 2021

Disney drops dress requirements in inclusion drive

15 Apr 2021

Religious dress: Modest fashion in women’s working life

12 Feb 2021
  • The Search for Talent: Six Major Employer Pitfalls PROMOTED | The Great Resignation continues unabated...Read more
  • Navigating the widening “Skills Confidence Gap” in 2022, and beyond PROMOTED | Cornerstone OnDemand conducted a global study...Read more
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+