Image bias could be causing employers to miss out on the best candidates, according to research that revealed the majority of recruiters believe having a tattoo could limit career progression.
A survey conducted by LinkedIn found that 88% of recruiters and HR professionals considered that tattoos limited a candidate’s career prospects, while three quarters said a person’s image played a significant part in the hiring process.
Four in 10 admitted that they had rejected a candidate with suitable experience because they had a visible tattoo. Around two-fifths said they had rejected a tattooed candidate because of strict employer dress codes.
Dress codes
Just under half (47%) of recruiters said industry intolerance led them to find that people with tattoos could be unsuitable candidates, while 46% thought it showed a lack of professionalism.
Other elements of appearance also were considered during the recruitment process. A third (34%) claimed they would feel uncomfortable hiring someone who was wearing casual clothing, 26% would not feel happy hiring someone with visible piercings, and 21% were unsure about hiring a person with brightly-dyed hair.
Rebecca Drew, sales manager at LinkedIn Talent Solutions, said: “With almost a fifth of UK adults currently estimated as having a tattoo, the current attitude around visible tattoos and physical image means that businesses and recruiters could be missing out on top talent.”
Despite the survey findings, she said it was encouraging to see that employers and recruiters were taking steps to reduce image and tattoo bias, such as holding phone interviews, virtual reality assessments and screening candidates via bots to strip a person’s image out of the hiring process.
A third (32%) said phone interviews were the most beneficial in reducing image bias, while 28% said virtual reality assessments would help. Screening was favoured by 21% of those surveyed.
“As we continue to see AI tools incorporated into hiring processes, we hope this will help recruiters remove some of the human bias from the process, and focus on judging candidate potential against the most important things,” added Drew.
Of 2,000 job seekers surveyed, 80% of those with tattoos said they had never felt they had been rejected from a job opportunity because of their visible tattoos, while 34% said they didn’t think a tattoo would hold their career back.
You are right. But it also means the the person who was covered in tattoos could miss out on opportunities. Add on top of the fact that the job seeker chose to be covered in tattoos and you have the responsibility sitting on the job seekers head. So using words like “Tattoo Bias” just means leave the door open for people to not own their own dirt and point a finger and try to blame someone for the ramifications of their own choices.
True! I agree with your post. It is seen that it most of the countries, the tattoo and image bias is quite common. They are not selecting candidates as they think that the candidates are not good in looks or not too professional to work. Even the tattoo becomes an obstruction in the career path. However, removing the tattoo and image bias should be done in the process of recruitment and the candidates should be selected on the basis of talent.