Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Latest NewsEmployee relationsEmployment lawEquality, diversity and inclusionAge discrimination

Air traffic control age limit found to be ageist

by John Charlton 27 Feb 2009
by John Charlton 27 Feb 2009

London Central Employment Tribunal has ruled that the National Air Traffic Services (NATS) ban on considering candidates aged 36 and above for air traffic control jobs is unlawful under the 2006 Age Discrimination regulations.

The case was brought by P Baker, 51, who made an online application to NATS for a trainee air traffic controller position but was rejected automatically because of his age. He had aviation experience, including a civil pilot’s licence, and had wished to pursue a career as a commercial pilot but lacked the funds to pursue the necessary qualifications.

NATS told the tribunal that its age limit was based on concerns about safety, possible declines in performance related to age, and the cost of training, which it put at about £600,000 per trainee. It told Personnel Today that it had commissioned independent research which indicated that performance in relevant areas could fall away with age.

But Baker’s legal representative, Virginia Allen, associate at Baker and McKenzie, said NATS “didn’t supply sufficient evidence to justify its age limit.”

NATS said it was “disappointed by the tribunal’s judgment”.

“Independent research demonstrated that the skills used by controllers working in a high-performance environment decline after age 45 unless the individual has some 10 years’ experience before that point. NATS controllers must be capable of operating to our exacting standards in some of the world’s busiest and most complex environments.”

It added: “Our only interest has been to provide a safe air traffic control service, and we will be taking time to study the tribunal’s decision before deciding how best to move forward.”

When the age discrimination regulations were applied in 2006, NATS removed the age limit from its recruitment website and did recruit a 41-year-old to a trainee position, but it reinstated the age limit in 2007.

Allen said Baker may re-apply if NATS changes its recruitment policy. Baker and McKenzie said that many countries do not operate a ban on older recruits, including Canada, Spain and Ireland. But the US has an upper age limit of 25 for trainees, as did NATS in the 1980s.

The tribunal said it was “concerned that the assumptions about age are ingrained and will be difficult to eradicate”. It added that NATS “may need to consider a robust review of their procedures to ensure that any age bias is removed”.

Baker said he was “absolutely delighted with the judgment. I always thought the refusal to consider my application was a clear act of age discrimination.”

Retirement age for NATS air traffic controllers is 60.

Avatar
John Charlton

previous post
Career progression menu gives restaurant staff taste of things to come
next post
HR fury over ‘political’ move to restrict migrant workers

You may also like

MP demands timeline on carer’s leave legislation

13 May 2022

Employment tribunal: use of word ‘bald’ can amount...

13 May 2022

Rees-Mogg under fire from civil service leader over...

13 May 2022

Prime minister steps up calls for 90,000 civil...

13 May 2022

Spain plans menstrual leave for painful periods

13 May 2022

‘Small spike’ in minimum wage underpayment among 20-24...

13 May 2022

Tesco to pioneer office space in local stores

13 May 2022

How employers can support women during the HRT...

13 May 2022

What it really means to be mentally fit

13 May 2022

What is employee wellbeing? Gethin Nadin talks to...

13 May 2022
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

TOPICS

Economics, government & business
Employee Relations
Employment law
Equality & diversity
Global HR
HR practice
HR strategy
Learning & training
Occupational health
Pay & benefits
Recruitment & retention
HR Tech
Wellbeing
All HR topics

WHAT’S HOT

Apprenticeship levy
Brexit
Covid-19 coronavirus
Gender pay gap reporting
Gig economy
Holiday pay
HR tech
IR35
Immigration
People analytics
Zero-hours contracts

JOBS

Post a job
Why advertise with us?
Change Management
Compensation & Benefits
Diversity & Inclusion
Employee Relations
Employment Law
Health & Safety
HR (General)
HR Business Partner
HR Director
HR Consultant
HR Shared Services
HR Systems
People Analytics
Learning & Development
Training
Occupational Health
Organisational Development
Payroll
Performance & Engagement
Recruitment & Resourcing
Talent Management
Wellbeing
Workforce Planning

ABOUT

About Personnel Today
Contact us
Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022
RSS feeds
Advertising specifications
Email Newsletters
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards

Employee Benefits
Employee Benefits Awards
Employee Benefits Live

Forum for Expatriate Management

OHW+
OHW+ membership

Whatmedia

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+