Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Latest NewsGig economyMinimum wageWhistleblowing

Amazon delivery firms in employment status fight

by Adam McCulloch 4 Jun 2018
by Adam McCulloch 4 Jun 2018 Photo: Shutterstock
Photo: Shutterstock

The GMB has announced that it will take legal action against three Amazon delivery companies over their classification of drivers as self-employed.

The case is the latest in a series of gig economy legal cases brought by the union since it won the landmark judgment against Uber in 2016.

Gig economy

Regulation and the gig economy: It is not just about worker status

Acas updates its guidance to reflect gig economy developments

MPs urge ministers to speed up gig economy measures

The legal action being taken by GMB is on behalf of members carrying out work for Prospect Commercials, Box Group and Lloyd Link Logistics.

The claimants all worked for the companies as couriers, delivering packages on behalf of Amazon.

The GMB claims that the drivers were actually employees, and the companies used the self-employment model to wrongly deny them rights such as the national minimum wage and holiday pay.

The drivers were required to work scheduled shifts controlled by Amazon, meaning they did not have the flexibility that many would consider integral to being self-employed. In this situation, argues the GMB, the couriers were treated like employees in terms of their working hours, and they should be treated as employees in terms of their rights, too.

Some of the claims are being made directly against Amazon because the GMB considers it was the online retail giant that determined how the drivers should work. In these cases, the drivers said they were dismissed because of their whistleblowing. They claimed their roles were terminated because they raised concerns about working practices, for example, that the number of parcels allocated to drivers resulted in excessive hours and driving unsafely to meet targets.

The whistleblowers also alleged that drivers were being underpaid and not receiving the amounts that they were contractually entitled to.

One of the drivers who is involved in the case told the GMB how he once left the house at 6am, and did not return until 11pm at night, yet still had £1 per undelivered parcel deducted from his wages.

A driver also reported that he had been told by his employer to complete a route and so had sometimes driven when “half asleep at the wheel” in order to ensure he got paid.

GMB general secretary Tim Roache said: “Companies like Amazon and their delivery companies can’t have it both ways – they can’t decide they want all of the benefits of having an employee, but refuse to give those employees the pay and rights they’re entitled to.”

Jeremy Coy, associate at Russell-Cooke solicitors, said: “There is a misconception that labelling staff as self-employed and paying them without deducting tax will ensure that they do not acquire the rights of workers or employees. This is not the case. What is important is the nature of the relationship between the organisation and the individual.”

He added: “Factors which are usually taken into account in determining employment status are whether the individual is obligated to do the work they are offered and whether the organisation is required to provide the individual with work.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

“Another consideration is the degree of control which the organisation exercises over the individual, for example by telling him or her where and when to work and how to do the job.”

Amazon said it expected its delivery firms to pay drivers a minimum of £12 an hour, “follow all applicable laws and driving regulations and drive safely”.

gmbAmazon
Adam McCulloch

Adam McCulloch first worked for Personnel Today magazine in the early 1990s as a sub editor. He rejoined Personnel Today as a writer in 2017, covering all aspects of HR but with a special interest in diversity, social mobility and industrial relations. He has ventured beyond the HR realm to work as a freelance writer and production editor in sectors including travel (The Guardian), aviation (Flight International), agriculture (Farmers' Weekly), music (Jazzwise), theatre (The Stage) and social work (Community Care). He is also the author of KentWalksNearLondon. Adam first became interested in industrial relations after witnessing an exchange between Arthur Scargill and National Coal Board chairman Ian McGregor in 1984, while working as a temp in facilities at the NCB, carrying extra chairs into a conference room!

previous post
Firms face legal challenge over ‘arbitrary’ training fees
next post
Home secretary Javid announces review of Tier 2 immigration

You may also like

Restaurant tips should be included in holiday pay

21 May 2025

Fewer workers would comply with a return-to-office mandate

21 May 2025

Redefining leadership: From competence to inclusion

21 May 2025

Pay awards in real terms could fall for...

21 May 2025

Ryanair demands flight attendants pay back salary increase

21 May 2025

Consultation launched after Supreme Court ‘sex’ ruling

20 May 2025

Uncertainty over law hampering legal use of medical...

20 May 2025

Black security manager awarded £360k after decade of...

20 May 2025

Employers ‘worryingly’ ignorant about stress risk assessments

20 May 2025

UK and EU agree to collaborate on ‘youth...

19 May 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+