Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+

Settlement agreementsSexual harassmentLatest NewsNon-disclosure agreementsSex discrimination

Government considering making employee references mandatory

by Rob Moss 29 Oct 2019
by Rob Moss 29 Oct 2019 Women and Equalities Committee chair Maria Miller. Photo: Kirsty O'Connor/PA Archive/PA Images
Women and Equalities Committee chair Maria Miller. Photo: Kirsty O'Connor/PA Archive/PA Images

The government has said it will consult on the idea that employers should be required to provide, as a minimum, a basic reference – for example, confirming that they worked for that employer and the dates of their employment – for any former employee.

There is currently no statutory obligation for an employer to provide a reference. With the exception of certain regulated sectors, it is a matter for individual employers whether to provide a reference.

Misuse of non-disclosure agreements

New laws on misuse of NDAs in the workplace

#MeToo at two: how far have we come?

In its response to recommendations made by the Women and Equalities Select Committee’s inquiry into the use of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) in discrimination cases, the government said it could understand why the withholding of a reference could pose a problem for victims of sex or other discrimination.“We think there is merit in considering this idea further and will consult on this matter in due course,” it stated.

It also said the online publication of employment tribunal decisions should not disadvantage claimants, after MPs said that people with particular types of claim may be negatively affected by aspects of the tribunal system.

The government said it “takes seriously” any suggestion that the tribunal system is disadvantaging certain groups of individuals.

“We will therefore work to better understand the nature of the concerns raised and assess whether there are any which are not being addressed by the various [planned] improvements,” it told the committee in its response.

It added that tribunals must balance the individual right to privacy with wider principles. In many proceedings, the principle of open justice outweighs the right to privacy.

“HM Courts & Tribunals staff are already taking steps to ensure that hearing participants and other involved parties are aware that they are able to apply to have written judgments anonymised. The government is working to ensure these actions are consistently and effectively applied.”

Responding to 45 committee recommendations, the government agreed that the use of NDAs to cover up unlawful discrimination and harassment complaints is unacceptable. In response to its own consultation the government committed to introducing reforms that would prevent employers from misusing NDAs.

And it shared concerns that the repeated inappropriate use of NDAs within an organisation may prevent it from recognising, and therefore addressing, significant underlying problems.

Maria Miller, chair of the Women and Equalities Committee, said: “While we appreciate that this is a legally-complex issue the government is taking seriously, we are also aware of the emotional, psychological and financial [impact] the use of NDA’s can have on individual employees and their ability to work.

“It is now two years on since such use of NDAs was brought to the public’s attention and over a year since we reported on sexual harassment in the workplace.

“There is an urgent need for the government to now act on our report and their own consultations on employment tribunal time limits, sexual harassment in the workplace and the new single labour market enforcement body to improve the protections for people who suffer discrimination or harassment at work.”

The government said it had considered carefully whether to make the misuse of NDAs  criminal offence but  said it “believes that existing and proposed measures represent a proportionate response to the concerns identified but remains open to considering stronger sanctions in the future if these measures to encourage or enforce appropriate behaviour prove ineffective”.

Another recommendation called for employer reporting on maternity retention rates, something the government said it was carefully considering.

Latest HR job opportunities on Personnel Today

Browse more human resources jobs

Rob Moss
Rob Moss

Rob Moss is a business journalist with more than 25 years' experience. He has been editor of Personnel Today since 2010. He joined the publication in 2006 as online editor of the award-winning website. He specialises in labour market economics, gender diversity and family-friendly working. He has hosted hundreds of webinar and podcasts, most recently on the challenges created by the coronavirus pandemic. Before writing about HR and employment he ran news and feature desks on publications serving the global optical and eyewear market, the UK electrical industry, and electrical markets in Asia and the Middle East.

previous post
MPs to examine police disciplinary system
next post
Full-time gender pay gap widens to 8.9%

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment.

You may also like

Top 10 HR questions December 2021: NHS Covid...

4 Jan 2022

Ten years of the Equality Act 2010: key...

1 Oct 2020

How to avoid risk when providing employer references

7 Oct 2019

Top 10 HR questions July 2019: Spent convictions

5 Aug 2019

Top 10 HR questions May 2019: Ramadan, redundancy...

5 Jun 2019

Top 10 HR questions February 2019: Redundancy, FTCs...

1 Mar 2019

Top 10 HR questions September 2018 – probation...

2 Oct 2018

Top 10 HR questions May 2018: GDPR special...

1 Jun 2018

Claim for negligent reference dismissed: what now for...

26 Apr 2018

Charity scandal: can employers inform others about misconduct?

23 Feb 2018
  • Apprenticeships are the solution to your recruitment problems PROMOTED | Apprenticeships have the pulling power...Read more
  • What it really means to be mentally fit PROMOTED | What is mental fitness...Read more
  • How music can help to ease anxiety at work PROMOTED | A lot has happened since March 2020, hasn’t it?...Read more
  • Why now is the time to plug the unhealthy gap PROMOTED | We’ve all heard the term ‘health is wealth’...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2022

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2022 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
    • Advertise
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Equality, diversity and inclusion
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • Maternity & Paternity
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
    • OHW Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • XpertHR
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Pricing
    • Free trial
    • Subscribe
    • XpertHR USA
  • Webinars
  • OHW+