An office worker who was repeatedly ignored by her boss when she greeted him wins a claim for unfair dismissal.
Case law
-
-
EHRC launches consultation on code of practice for services, public functions and associations, which has been updated in light of case law.
-
An administrator who was sacked for insulting a customer in an email wins a payout of almost £5,500 after claiming unfair dismissal.
-
School agrees to pay £850k to teacher with autism, dismissed after serial complaints
by Rob Mossby Rob MossTeacher with autism who repeatedly raised grievances to receive £850k after tribunal finds he was discriminated against and victimised.
-
Supreme Court unanimously rules that Tesco cannot fire and rehire distribution workers who receive ‘retained pay’ and reinstates injunction.
-
Employment specialists have their say on the Tesco v Usdaw fire and rehire verdict.
-
Former Mitie employee criticised for being “very emotional and tearful” during pregnancy wins compensation boost totalling £350,000.
-
A retired major has won a landmark case against the Ministry of Defence that could mean thousands of reservists will receive army pensions.
-
An appeal by British Airways relating to associative discrimination and its practice of ‘fire and rehire’ has been thrown out by the Employment Appeal Tribunal.
-
Three white police officers who were passed over for promotion in favour of an ethnic minority candidate have won their claim.
-
Care assistant who failed to disclose a murder charge has won her claim for unfair dismissal at Edinburgh Employment Tribunal.
-
Court of Appeal upholds ruling that a written actuarial confirmation was needed for changes to Virgin Media pension scheme’s rules.
-
Unwanted contact during sick leave: employers must take a cautious approach to contacting staff on sick leave after a recent tribunal win.
-
Gender-critical worker who chose to use the 'preferred pronouns' 'XYChromosomeGuy/ AdultHumanMale' loses claim for belief discrimination.
-
Dr Emily Andrews from the Centre for Ageing Better argues that ageist employers harm both themselves and the economy.