Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Recruitment & retentionHR TechnologyOnline recruitment

Senior recruitment: LinkedIn no substitute for human factor

by Cath Everett 7 Apr 2015
by Cath Everett 7 Apr 2015

LinkedIn was supposed to be the online tool that would kill traditional recruitment, but, as Cath Everett discovers, hiring the right candidate should be a far more personal experience.

Business networking site LinkedIn has had a massive impact on the recruitment and sourcing industry over the last few years, but claims that it would replace traditional recruitment and become the Holy Grail of hiring have been discredited for some time.

In fact, when it comes to senior-level recruitment, it appears that downright disillusion may even have set in.

According to a survey undertaken on behalf of Norrie Johnston Recruitment, which specialises in senior recruitment, a mere 4% of the 100 HR directors questioned said they felt that advertising via the channel was the best way to find personnel commanding salaries of more than £70,000 per annum.

Amanda Fone, founder and managing partner of f1 Recruitment, in her recent blog LinkedIn fatigue: reaching epidemic proportions, also takes a very similar tack.

“Companies and individuals tell us they now miss having an informed middle person to broker and manage the interview process, to make introductions and to provide insight into companies on their behalf,” she said. “Clients that resolutely told us that they would not use us again for roles beneath £60,000 are coming back to us in their droves.”

So what is going on? Well, the survey appears to reveal a number of underlying concerns with taking a purely social-network-based approach:

  • Even though LinkedIn has 300 million members, a lot of senior candidates do not use it very regularly.
  • About half of the HR directors questioned felt that senior recruitment was not a numbers game, so having a massive pool of candidates on tap was not necessarily what they were after. Wading through huge volumes of candidates was often very time consuming for internal teams (25%), particularly if they did not have the specialist recruitment skills required to handle senior and technical roles.
  • Around 46% of respondents were unsure as to the integrity of candidate information, with only 8% fully believing the profiles that they read, thus assigning them a mere 5.3 out of 10 for usefulness when checking people out.
  • LinkedIn does not provide the anonymity that two in five of the survey’s respondents believe would-be employers or candidates really want.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Interestingly, Fone also points out that the dropout rate when hiring candidates tends to be higher using LinkedIn rather than a traditional agency, which “meets them face to face and matches values and behaviours as well as skills”.

All of which goes to show that, while technology definitely has its place, it is not a substitute for the human factor.

Cath Everett

Cath has been a journalist and editor for more than 20 years, specialising in HR and technology issues.

previous post
Election 2015: Zero hours contracts debate continues
next post
Will tougher trade union laws curb strike action?

1 comment

Sam Jobsgopublic 9 Apr 2015 - 3:06 pm

This is a really interesting article. We find that solely using LinkedIn as a recruitment tool ca be ineffective however using it as part of a multi-platform approach can work really well.

It also seems to vary massively between sectors and occupations, we get fantastic responses in some sectors and virtually nothing in others.

It’s interesting that you say that it particularly doesn’t work with senior roles as this is definitely an area where we get some of the best response. Using LinkedIn for resourcing purposes with senior roles has been a highly effective way of opening a dialogue with prospective candidates.

Comments are closed.

You may also like

Workers ‘wait and see’ as companies struggle to...

16 May 2025

So what does the election of a new...

9 May 2025

Rumours during recruitment: how should HR respond?

9 May 2025

Teacher apprenticeship route to be tied to school...

9 May 2025

CIPD appoints expert in AI to boost support...

8 May 2025

Preparing for a new era of workforce planning...

8 May 2025

British Steel to resume recruitment

8 May 2025

M&S pauses hiring as it deals with cyber...

2 May 2025

Top 10 HR questions April 2025: increases to...

2 May 2025

Quarter of employees worried AI will threaten jobs...

28 Apr 2025

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+