A new minimum wage of £7.20 per hour will be introduced next April for all working people aged 25 and over, the Government has announced.
In his first purely Conservative budget, George Osborne said that “Britain deserves a pay rise and Britain is getting a pay rise”.
The “national living wage” (NLW) will be compulsory and the Low Pay Commission (LPC) will recommend future rises, with the Government aiming for it to reach £9 an hour by 2020.
National living wage resources
National living wage survey 2015
XpertHR Benchmarking: National Living Wage 2015/2016
National living wage: an important but complex shift in policy
Osborne said that the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) claimed the national living wage would have only a “fractional” effect on jobs. The OBR said that by 2020 there will be 60,000 fewer jobs as a result of the national living wage, but almost one million more in total.
The OBR has estimated that the cost to business will amount to 1% of profits. To offset that cost, the Government is cutting corporation tax to 19% in 2017 and 18% in 2020. Small firms will also benefit from a cut in their national insurance contributions.
“From 2016, our new Employment Allowance, will now be increased by 50% to £3,000,” announced Osborne. “That means a firm will be able to employ four people full time on the new national living wage and pay no national insurance at all.”
The national minimum wage currently stands at £6.50, rising to £6.70 in October. For those aged 25 and above, their hourly rate will rise to £7.20 in April 2016, an 11% hike on the current mandatory pay rate.
Alongside the Budget, the Government published an entirely new remit for the LPC.
To ensure that the rate of the NLW is set at a sustainable level and continues to take account of broader economic conditions, the LPC’s remit will require it to set the NLW in a way that reflects the growth in median earnings.
The LPC’s remit in relation to the NMW, which will now only apply to those under 25, will remain unchanged.
The Government will ask the LPC to set out how it will reach 60% of median earnings by 2020; based on OBR forecasts.
National living wage: why it pays to move now
[typography font=”Molengo” size=”1.0″ size_format=”em” color=”#202020″]Recent weeks have seen high-profile employers or setting their rates higher than the voluntary levels of the Living Wage. Jo Faragher looks at how employers are dealing with low pay and preparing for next year’s national living wage. Read more…[/typography]
Also announced in today’s budget:
- Public-sector pay awards will continue to be 1% per year for the next four years.
- Osborne confirmed that the personal income tax allowance will increase to £11,000, with the aim of reaching £12,500 by 2020. The higher rate income tax threshold will rise to £43,000.
- The Government said that it will actively monitor the growth of these salary-sacrifice schemes and their effect on tax receipts.
Budget 2015 reaction
The current UK Living Wage, set by the Living Wage Foundation is £7.85. And the rate in London is already £9.15. Rhys Moore, director of the Living Wage Foundation, said it was “delighted” that more than 2.5 million workers will receive a much needed pay rise. However, he asked, “Is this really a living wage?
“The Living Wage is calculated according to the cost of living whereas the LPC calculates a rate according to what the market can bear. Without a change of remit for the LPC, this is effectively a higher national minimum wage and not a living wage.”
“Britain deserves a pay rise and Britain is getting a pay rise” – George Osborne
John Cridland, director-general of the CBI, said: “This is a double-edged budget for business. Firms will welcome measures to balance the books and boost investment, but they will be concerned by legislating for wage increases they may not be able to deliver.”
Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance
Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday
Mark Beatson, chief economist for the CIPD, said that while the OBR claims the national living wage will have little net effect on employment, their forecasts rely on assumptions about future productivity growth that have proved wrong to date.
“This policy will only deliver higher pay without significant job losses if it is accompanied by a drive to increase productivity in low pay sectors such as retail, hairdressing, hospitality and the care sector – and that will need more than delivery of apprenticeship numbers or employment subsidies via the national insurance contributions system,” he commented.