Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

Personnel Today

Register
Log in
Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+

BrexitEmployment lawLatest NewsWorking Time Regulations

Workers’ rights at risk unless UK and EU adopt right approach

by Ashleigh Webber 9 Oct 2018
by Ashleigh Webber 9 Oct 2018 London has not been the main driver behind the boom in employment across the UK in recent years
London has not been the main driver behind the boom in employment across the UK in recent years

Workers’ rights could be at risk if the UK and the EU do not adopt the right approach to preserving European employment law after Brexit, a think tank has argued.

Both the UK and EU have suggested that the current employment protections under EU legislation can be guaranteed through a non-regression clause after Brexit, which would require both parties to maintain the level of protection currently offered to workers.

Employment law post-Brexit

What impact will Brexit have on employment law?

Five Brexit risks employers should plan for

However, the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) suggests that non-regression clauses are problematic as enforcement would be largely left up to domestic authorities and would not take into account future employment protections brought in by the EU.

Its report – A level playing field for workers – says the majority of UK workers support the continuation of EU workers’ rights after Brexit.

Seventy three per cent of people it surveyed support the protection or the extension of the Working Time Directive, while the same percentage want to broaden or maintain temporary agency workers’ rights.

The report says: “There is also a growing recognition of the importance of employment protections for the economy.

“While in the past employment rights tended to be seen as a hindrance to growth, voices from across the spectrum have begun to make an argument for employment rights grounded on their economic benefits.”

The IPPR suggests the best method of harmonising workers’ rights across the UK and the EU would be  a “common rulebook” approach, which would involve listing all relevant EU employment directives in the UK-EU agreement. The rulebook would be updated over time to bring any new EU employment legislation into UK law.

The report recommends that the law would be enforced by a “supranational supervision authority”, made up of representatives from a number of nations.

“Combined, this package of scope, governance and updating arrangements would help to secure the most robust and sustainable level playing field on employment protections between the UK and the EU,” the report says.

Sign up to our weekly round-up of HR news and guidance

Receive the Personnel Today Direct e-newsletter every Wednesday

OptOut
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

However, it recognises that this approach would only likely be taken in the case of a “high integration” relationship between the UK and EU, where there are few trade barriers.

If a weaker deal is struck by the two parties, an “enhanced non-regression clause” would be the best option, it claims. This would involve strengthened governance of the rules, compared to the limited governance offered under a standard non-regression clause, but the agreement would be unlikely to include new EU employment laws brought in after Brexit.

Ashleigh Webber

Ashleigh is a former editor of OHW+ and former HR and wellbeing editor at Personnel Today. Ashleigh's areas of interest include employee health and wellbeing, equality and inclusion and skills development. She has hosted many webinars for Personnel Today, on topics including employee retention, financial wellbeing and menopause support.

previous post
Three-quarters of services firms struggling to fill vacancies
next post
Union urges Uber users not to cross ‘digital picket line’

You may also like

Labour MPs urge more flexibility with EU over...

24 Apr 2025

Trump’s tariffs to hit growth and jobs, warn...

3 Apr 2025

Youth mobility scheme on the table for Starmer...

21 Feb 2025

Sharp decline in net migration as fewer dependants...

28 Nov 2024

Qualified support for Reeves after Mansion House speech

15 Nov 2024

Why ministers must restore the EU youth mobility...

21 Oct 2024

Barriers to workers getting qualifications recognised in EU

2 Jul 2024

SNP manifesto: NHS investment and rejoining the EU

19 Jun 2024

Seasonal farm worker brings tribunal case over unpaid...

24 May 2024

Co-Op Live delays caused by Brexit labour shortages,...

15 May 2024

  • 2025 Employee Communications Report PROMOTED | HR and leadership...Read more
  • The Majority of Employees Have Their Eyes on Their Next Move PROMOTED | A staggering 65%...Read more
  • Prioritising performance management: Strategies for success (webinar) WEBINAR | In today’s fast-paced...Read more
  • Self-Leadership: The Key to Successful Organisations PROMOTED | Eletive is helping businesses...Read more
  • Retaining Female Talent: Four Ways to Reduce Workplace Drop Out PROMOTED | International Women’s Day...Read more

Personnel Today Jobs
 

Search Jobs

PERSONNEL TODAY

About us
Contact us
Browse all HR topics
Email newsletters
Content feeds
Cookies policy
Privacy policy
Terms and conditions

JOBS

Personnel Today Jobs
Post a job
Why advertise with us?

EVENTS & PRODUCTS

The Personnel Today Awards
The RAD Awards
Employee Benefits
Forum for Expatriate Management
OHW+
Whatmedia

ADVERTISING & PR

Advertising opportunities
Features list 2025

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin


© 2011 - 2025 DVV Media International Ltd

Personnel Today
  • Home
    • All PT content
  • Email sign-up
  • Topics
    • HR Practice
    • Employee relations
    • Learning & training
    • Pay & benefits
    • Wellbeing
    • Recruitment & retention
    • HR strategy
    • HR Tech
    • The HR profession
    • Global
    • All HR topics
  • Legal
    • Case law
    • Commentary
    • Flexible working
    • Legal timetable
    • Maternity & paternity
    • Shared parental leave
    • Redundancy
    • TUPE
    • Disciplinary and grievances
    • Employer’s guides
  • AWARDS
    • Personnel Today Awards
    • The RAD Awards
  • Jobs
    • Find a job
    • Jobs by email
    • Careers advice
    • Post a job
  • Brightmine
    • Learn more
    • Products
    • Free trial
    • Request a quote
  • Webinars
  • Advertise
  • OHW+