Employment lawyer John Hayes takes issue with an article in The Times and explains why UK law strikes the right balance.
Employment law
-
-
An investigation has found that former Post Office chairman Henry Staunton used ‘offensive and outdated’ terms when discussing a job...
-
Searches for flexible, fully-remote or remote-first work have risen over the past year amid return-to-office mandates.
-
Legislation found to offer no protection from trade union detriment is incompatible with human rights law, the Supreme Court has ruled.
-
Senior manager loses claim for discrimination against his non-feminist belief, after tribunal rules he was the ‘author of his own downfall’.
-
XpertHR has rebranded as Brightmine, in a shift that recognises that HR's role is becoming more complex and has a greater need for data analytics.
-
A Dorset Police officer allegedly used bolt cutters to 'forcibly' remove earrings worn by three trainee officers ahead of a fitness test.
-
Analysis shows 1.4 million people face the ‘double jeopardy’ of working in severely insecure jobs while privately renting.
-
Tata Steel has threatened to withhold an enhanced redundancy package if employees go on strike.
-
Most graduates feel office attendance is expected by their employers, according to new research from Prospects at Jisc.
-
Tribunal finds the Department for Work and Pensions treated an autistic work coach unfavourably and failed to make reasonable adjustments for him.
-
Italy has joined the ranks of countries serving digital nomad visas. How attractive are such offers to British remote workers?
-
Italy has launched a digital nomad visa that will allow remote workers to live and work in the country on a continual basis.
-
The UK's current immigration policy is harmful to businesses, a report says, organisations still rely on international workers.
-
Union encourages civil servants to submit grievance over return to office
by Jo Faragherby Jo FaragherPublic sector union PCS is encouraging its members to submit a grievance over the government’s plans to require civil servants to return to offices.